* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for ipv4 checksum calculating
@ 2020-05-26 10:08 guohongzhi
2020-06-24 11:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: guohongzhi @ 2020-05-26 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Cc: stable, olivier.matz, mb, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu,
ferruh.yigit, nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin,
chenchanghu, jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin, guohongzhi1
From: Hongzhi Guo <guohongzhi1@huawei.com>
0xffff is invalid for IPv4 checksum(RFC1624)
Fixes: 6006818cfb26 ("net: new checksum functions")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Reviewed-By: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: Hongzhi Guo <guohongzhi1@huawei.com>
---
lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
index 1ceb7b7..ece2e43 100644
--- a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
+++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ rte_ipv4_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr)
{
uint16_t cksum;
cksum = rte_raw_cksum(ipv4_hdr, sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
- return (cksum == 0xffff) ? cksum : (uint16_t)~cksum;
+ return (uint16_t)~cksum;
}
/**
--
2.21.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for ipv4 checksum calculating
2020-05-26 10:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for ipv4 checksum calculating guohongzhi
@ 2020-06-24 11:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-06-24 11:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guohongzhi1
Cc: dev, stable, olivier.matz, mb, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu,
ferruh.yigit, nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin,
chenchanghu, jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin
26/05/2020 12:08, guohongzhi:
> From: Hongzhi Guo <guohongzhi1@huawei.com>
>
> 0xffff is invalid for IPv4 checksum(RFC1624)
>
> Fixes: 6006818cfb26 ("net: new checksum functions")
> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>
> Reviewed-By: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongzhi Guo <guohongzhi1@huawei.com>
The Signed-off should be in chronological order, before reviews.
As suggested in previous patch, the title should be
net: fix IPv4 checksum
I am doing above modifications while merging.
More advices about submitting patches:
- use -v2, -v3, etc when sending new versions
- add a changelog below the line ---
- use --in-reply-to to keep all versions threaded
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ rte_ipv4_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr)
> {
> uint16_t cksum;
> cksum = rte_raw_cksum(ipv4_hdr, sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
> - return (cksum == 0xffff) ? cksum : (uint16_t)~cksum;
> + return (uint16_t)~cksum;
> }
Applied, thanks
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for ipv4 checksum calculating
2020-05-26 9:16 guohongzhi
@ 2020-05-26 9:31 ` Morten Brørup
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Morten Brørup @ 2020-05-26 9:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guohongzhi
Cc: dev, olivier.matz, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu, ferruh.yigit,
nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin, chenchanghu,
jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin
guohongzhi,
You must use your real name in the Signed-off-by line.
The signoff must be a real name and not an alias or nickname. For further details, please refer to: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/process/submitting-patches.html#developer-s-certificate-of-origin-1-1
Med venlig hilsen / kind regards
- Morten Brørup
> -----Original Message-----
> From: guohongzhi [mailto:guohongzhi1@huawei.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2020 11:17 AM
> To: dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: olivier.matz@6wind.com; Morten Brørup;
> konstantin.ananyev@intel.com; jiayu.hu@intel.com;
> ferruh.yigit@intel.com; nicolas.chautru@intel.com;
> cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com; zhoujingbin@huawei.com;
> chenchanghu@huawei.com; jerry.lilijun@huawei.com;
> haifeng.lin@huawei.com; guohongzhi1@huawei.com
> Subject: [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for ipv4 checksum calculating
>
> 0xffff is invalid for IPv4 checksum(RFC1624)
>
> Fixes: 6006818cfb26 ("net: new checksum functions")
>
> Reviewed-By: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
>
> Signed-off-by: guohongzhi <guohongzhi1@huawei.com>
> ---
> lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
> index 1ceb7b7..ece2e43 100644
> --- a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
> +++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
> @@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ rte_ipv4_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr)
> {
> uint16_t cksum;
> cksum = rte_raw_cksum(ipv4_hdr, sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
> - return (cksum == 0xffff) ? cksum : (uint16_t)~cksum;
> + return (uint16_t)~cksum;
> }
>
> /**
> --
> 2.21.0.windows.1
>
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for ipv4 checksum calculating
@ 2020-05-26 9:16 guohongzhi
2020-05-26 9:31 ` Morten Brørup
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: guohongzhi @ 2020-05-26 9:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Cc: olivier.matz, mb, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu, ferruh.yigit,
nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin, chenchanghu,
jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin, guohongzhi1
0xffff is invalid for IPv4 checksum(RFC1624)
Fixes: 6006818cfb26 ("net: new checksum functions")
Reviewed-By: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Signed-off-by: guohongzhi <guohongzhi1@huawei.com>
---
lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
index 1ceb7b7..ece2e43 100644
--- a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
+++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ rte_ipv4_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr)
{
uint16_t cksum;
cksum = rte_raw_cksum(ipv4_hdr, sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
- return (cksum == 0xffff) ? cksum : (uint16_t)~cksum;
+ return (uint16_t)~cksum;
}
/**
--
2.21.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for ipv4 checksum calculating
2020-05-14 1:27 guohongzhi
@ 2020-05-24 15:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-05-24 15:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: guohongzhi1
Cc: dev, olivier.matz, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu, ferruh.yigit,
nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin, chenchanghu,
jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin
14/05/2020 03:27, guohongzhi:
> The function of rte_ipv4_cksum for calculating the
> checksum of IPv4 header is incorrect.
> This function will return checksum value like 0xffff.
> This value, however, is considered an illegal checksum on some switches(like Trident3).
>
> RFC 1624 specifies the IPv4 checksum as follows:
> https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1624
> Since there is guaranteed to be at least one
> non-zero field in the IP header, and the checksum field in the
> protocol header is the complement of the sum, the checksum field can
> never contain ~(+0), which is -0 (0xFFFF). It can, however, contain
> ~(-0), which is +0 (0x0000).
>
> ---
> lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Suggested title:
net: fix IPv4 checksum
Please send a v2 with your full name and add a Signed-off-by line.
You can check the contributing guidelines:
http://core.dpdk.org/contribute/#send
You need to add these lines from previous reviews:
Fixes: 6006818cfb26 ("net: new checksum functions")
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Reviewed-By: Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for ipv4 checksum calculating
@ 2020-05-14 1:27 guohongzhi
2020-05-24 15:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: guohongzhi @ 2020-05-14 1:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: dev
Cc: olivier.matz, konstantin.ananyev, jiayu.hu, ferruh.yigit,
nicolas.chautru, cristian.dumitrescu, zhoujingbin, chenchanghu,
jerry.lilijun, haifeng.lin, guohongzhi1
The function of rte_ipv4_cksum for calculating the
checksum of IPv4 header is incorrect.
This function will return checksum value like 0xffff.
This value, however, is considered an illegal checksum on some switches(like Trident3).
RFC 1624 specifies the IPv4 checksum as follows:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1624
Since there is guaranteed to be at least one
non-zero field in the IP header, and the checksum field in the
protocol header is the complement of the sum, the checksum field can
never contain ~(+0), which is -0 (0xFFFF). It can, however, contain
~(-0), which is +0 (0x0000).
---
lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
index 1ceb7b7..ece2e43 100644
--- a/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
+++ b/lib/librte_net/rte_ip.h
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@ rte_ipv4_cksum(const struct rte_ipv4_hdr *ipv4_hdr)
{
uint16_t cksum;
cksum = rte_raw_cksum(ipv4_hdr, sizeof(struct rte_ipv4_hdr));
- return (cksum == 0xffff) ? cksum : (uint16_t)~cksum;
+ return (uint16_t)~cksum;
}
/**
--
2.21.0.windows.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-06-24 11:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2020-05-26 10:08 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] lib/librte_net: fix bug for ipv4 checksum calculating guohongzhi
2020-06-24 11:53 ` Thomas Monjalon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-26 9:16 guohongzhi
2020-05-26 9:31 ` Morten Brørup
2020-05-14 1:27 guohongzhi
2020-05-24 15:22 ` Thomas Monjalon
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).