DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Mattias Rönnblom" <hofors@lysator.liu.se>
To: "David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	"Morten Brørup" <mb@smartsharesystems.com>
Cc: "Mattias Rönnblom" <mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com>,
	dev@dpdk.org, "Luka Jankovic" <luka.jankovic@ericsson.com>,
	"Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops: fix issue in parallel atomic tests
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:33:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <29b26346-8ccc-4d7b-97b6-f77bd5fc85fb@lysator.liu.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJFAV8wfEKP7mM_Xr_sBFM5Q_AZNBdEbzz1mSViN-Wb-Zj1tWg@mail.gmail.com>

On 2024-10-14 16:16, David Marchand wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 13, 2024 at 5:37 PM Morten Brørup <mb@smartsharesystems.com> wrote:
>>> I'm far from sure it's a compiler bug. Just look at the base rate: how
>>> often does the code you just wrote fail because of a bug in your code,
>>> and how often is the root cause to be found in the compiler or the
>>> standard libraries.
>>>
>>
>> A strong argument for rootcausing exactly what the specific compiler gets wrong when compiling the code triggering the error.
>>
> 
> I agree that root causing it is preferrable.
> I merged this change in any case to resolve the false positives in CI.
> 
> 

The change is reworking some pretty awkward, potentially incorrect (if 
GCC 12.2 is right and I am wrong) code. So it should be merged in any 
case. The reason the reference word was always 64 bit was just an 
oversight on my part.


  reply	other threads:[~2024-10-14 14:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-10-13 11:57 Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-13 13:37 ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-13 15:19   ` Mattias Rönnblom
2024-10-13 15:36     ` Morten Brørup
2024-10-14 14:16       ` David Marchand
2024-10-14 14:33         ` Mattias Rönnblom [this message]
2024-10-14 14:14 ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=29b26346-8ccc-4d7b-97b6-f77bd5fc85fb@lysator.liu.se \
    --to=hofors@lysator.liu.se \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=luka.jankovic@ericsson.com \
    --cc=mattias.ronnblom@ericsson.com \
    --cc=mb@smartsharesystems.com \
    --cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).