From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 67698A0500; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:41:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0169B1BF7C; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:41:59 +0100 (CET) Received: from mail-wr1-f44.google.com (mail-wr1-f44.google.com [209.85.221.44]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BE911BF30 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:41:57 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wr1-f44.google.com with SMTP id d16so11820463wre.10 for ; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:41:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind.com; s=google; h=subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent :mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=4XKr6So2pmBQ/HhL3+LPVWhtsPKrHqoq1Zc0a+FYvmM=; b=QYeb1i7DdvEBbqhAEtbppRhKQkw/6AKaXRznOaVSMKlXAcn0DGC4nroKriDZgdtTnE mAPNDRjU5ZOrfef3DxqVa2x5fBChuhwAbIDbKtSffu42JbddNSK/ZxzczG8WVA9LRyJ7 AdTkXFB1OkyvFq2PUH+Zp3SvyHc/RDIaseGXYgRvHJEx6RqiDHuYHaVVozRTS0RSNRW7 79IGpTsErvFxnSU0UT6k1Qtx7kWueJBaoY1XGXsY97phceDoPY8hGtvp8Vi7lH7V77O4 KfnPepgO3tT8+C9a3anzq/KJQoyRBDiTOp/wq65Z+VBMyV+UpkcNXndnMXzjuphKGbLn 8JRg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=4XKr6So2pmBQ/HhL3+LPVWhtsPKrHqoq1Zc0a+FYvmM=; b=oJIzHTEjqQO0nuiwCR/qvVX/Hu7ZvVEhLUpAg0ZqAT08GJp4ruCVQN7W/LXFAgXs7B VIKrfswwZZ7WpWu4iX829p12mEopFJhhpNvsOExCBXlpPk5o+YxkEPOcYDahKWQYVLbx Ga5jV9oDPTGWp4si/2QLal4dAjDH1azuHyMoOO389yFkky2hw6cgHAL2cClRBtUyfQB6 2zokz2QdKDuJylN2R4cJdzztku0OMLIgj5CTxxkYo/1gqyiZcJPt+CttvzfKB5RIOpNa XvaJDDWRm+rI2+OI2JESufTzdE2tyI4FeMxR+f4PkW8jjk0g168bhDg7hVmS6YuC2z0g B2NQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXUguD8a0/W7pJFJ0YxujCOzM+hjy+7kb54kqYu3WDxqunD7gd4 Z4beMzIVui6HLrtE8nn0YD7P3kHvHV8= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyxQhjLnXkRKDYYbSA7+VGtcsE9+6GUzeglyeOtmUfnjmwVl2XnMf9CtK02RO+cFVWbMxzg4g== X-Received: by 2002:adf:fa87:: with SMTP id h7mr36228510wrr.172.1576597316933; Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:41:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.16.0.205] (host.78.145.23.62.rev.coltfrance.com. [62.23.145.78]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id o7sm3273509wmh.11.2019.12.17.07.41.56 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Dec 2019 07:41:56 -0800 (PST) To: Ajit Khaparde Cc: dpdk-dev References: From: Christophe Grosse Message-ID: <2a976877-e00f-83f9-dcd4-0a0dce28d8c3@6wind.com> Date: Tue, 17 Dec 2019 16:41:56 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: [dpdk-dev] BCM57414 VF Mode: max_rx_em_flows value is inconsistent X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Thank you for your answer. On 12/11/19 6:45 PM, Ajit Khaparde wrote: >> >> On master, I see that the new calculation for the number of L2 context >> has been restricted to Whitney chip family. >> Anyone knows if the chip/FW I am using is compatible with this new >> calculation ? >> >> By the way, I tried to upgrade to FW 214.0.253.5 and Init is falling very >> early: >> bnxt_hwrm_func_resc_qcaps(): error 1:0:00000000:00f9 >> > 214.0.x is older FW as far our releases are concerned. > I think you will need the following commit from upstream > to get past the error you are seeing. > Commit: 89a0deb866dc42ead92b79e6e7159622e1ab8490 > net/bnxt: fix resource qcaps with older FW I tried the previous commit. It suppresses a repetitive error message, that I didn't mention before. Also, I was able to start with firmware 214.0.253.5. But, if you say it's an old release, i won't use it. > > But I believe you will need a newer firmware to get consistent values > across the ports. Let me see how to get that to you. > If you have a new firmware for BCM57414, I would be glad to give it a try. (I currently have 20.06.01.06) Best Regards, Christophe