DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>
To: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
	Ilya Maximets <i.maximets@ovn.org>,
	Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>,
	dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Shahaf Shuler <shahafs@mellanox.com>,
	David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
	Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
	Obrembski MichalX <michalx.obrembski@intel.com>,
	Stokes Ian <ian.stokes@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] vhost: add support for large buffers
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 16:05:18 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <2b963349-66d9-179d-b480-6e15263733f3@ovn.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <62fb6a50-d4ab-584d-8cb2-4820c141f137@redhat.com>

On 16.10.2019 15:46, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> 
> 
> On 10/16/19 3:32 PM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 16.10.2019 13:13, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/15/19 8:59 PM, Flavio Leitner wrote:
>>>> The rte_vhost_dequeue_burst supports two ways of dequeuing data.
>>>> If the data fits into a buffer, then all data is copied and a
>>>> single linear buffer is returned. Otherwise it allocates
>>>> additional mbufs and chains them together to return a multiple
>>>> segments mbuf.
>>>>
>>>> While that covers most use cases, it forces applications that
>>>> need to work with larger data sizes to support multiple segments
>>>> mbufs. The non-linear characteristic brings complexity and
>>>> performance implications to the application.
>>>>
>>>> To resolve the issue, add support to attach external buffer
>>>> to a pktmbuf and let the host provide during registration if
>>>> attaching an external buffer to pktmbuf is supported and if
>>>> only linear buffer are supported.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Flavio Leitner <fbl@sysclose.org>
>>>> ---
>>>>    doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst |  35 +++++++++
>>>>    lib/librte_vhost/rte_vhost.h        |   4 +
>>>>    lib/librte_vhost/socket.c           |  22 ++++++
>>>>    lib/librte_vhost/vhost.c            |  22 ++++++
>>>>    lib/librte_vhost/vhost.h            |   4 +
>>>>    lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c       | 109 ++++++++++++++++++++++++----
>>>>    6 files changed, 182 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> - Changelog:
>>>>     v5:
>>>>       - fixed to destroy mutex if incompatible flags
>>>>     v4:
>>>>       - allow to use pktmbuf if there is exact space
>>>>       - removed log message if the buffer is too big
>>>>       - fixed the length to include align padding
>>>>       - free allocated buf if shinfo fails
>>>>     v3:
>>>>       - prevent the new features to be used with zero copy
>>>>       - fixed sizeof() usage
>>>>       - fixed log msg indentation
>>>>       - removed/replaced asserts
>>>>       - used the correct virt2iova function
>>>>       - fixed the patch's title
>>>>       - OvS PoC code:
>>>>         https://github.com/fleitner/ovs/tree/rte_malloc-v3
>>>>     v2:
>>>>       - Used rte_malloc() instead of another mempool as suggested by
>>>> Shahaf.
>>>>       - Added the documentation section.
>>>>       - Using driver registration to negotiate the features.
>>>>       - OvS PoC code:
>>>>        
>>>> https://github.com/fleitner/ovs/commit/8fc197c40b1d4fda331686a7b919e9e2b670dda7
>>>>
>>>
>>> Applied to dpdk-next-virtio/master.
>>
>> Thanks Maxime,
>>
>> But can we return back the mbuf allocation failure message?
> 
> Good point, I missed it.
> 
>> I mean:
>>
>> diff --git a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
>> index 66f0c7206..f8af4e0b3 100644
>> --- a/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
>> +++ b/lib/librte_vhost/virtio_net.c
>> @@ -1354,8 +1354,11 @@ virtio_dev_pktmbuf_alloc(struct virtio_net *dev,
>> struct rte_mempool *mp,
>>   {
>>       struct rte_mbuf *pkt = rte_pktmbuf_alloc(mp);
>>   
>> -    if (unlikely(pkt == NULL))
>> +    if (unlikely(pkt == NULL)) {
>> +        RTE_LOG(ERR, VHOST_DATA,
>> +            "Failed to allocate memory for mbuf.\n");
>>           return NULL;
>> +    }
>>   
>>       if (rte_pktmbuf_tailroom(pkt) >= data_len)
>>           return pkt;
>> ---
>>
>> It's a hard failure that highlights some significant issues with
>> memory pool size or a mbuf leak.
> 
> I agree, we need this error message.
> 
>> We still have the message for subsequent chained mbufs, but not
>> for the first one.  Without this error message we could never
>> notice that something is wrong with our memory pool.  Only the
>> network traffic will stop flowing.
>> The message was very useful previously while catching the root
>> cause of the mbuf leak in OVS.
>>
>> I could send a separate patch for this if needed.
> 
> We need a separate patch.
> If you want to do it, please do! Otherwise I'll do it.

OK. I'll send a patch soon.

Best regards, Ilya Maximets.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-10-16 14:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-10-01 22:19 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] vhost: add support to large linear mbufs Flavio Leitner
2019-10-01 23:10 ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-02  4:45 ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-10-02  8:04   ` David Marchand
2019-10-02  9:00     ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-10-02 12:58       ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-02 17:50         ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-10-02 18:15           ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-03 16:57             ` Ilya Maximets
2019-10-03 21:25               ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-02  7:51 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-04 20:10 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] vhost: add support for large buffers Flavio Leitner
2019-10-06  4:47   ` Shahaf Shuler
2019-10-10  5:12   ` Tiwei Bie
2019-10-10 12:12     ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-11 17:09   ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v3] " Flavio Leitner
2019-10-14  2:44     ` Tiwei Bie
2019-10-15 16:17     ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v4] " Flavio Leitner
2019-10-15 17:41       ` Ilya Maximets
2019-10-15 18:44         ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-15 18:59       ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5] " Flavio Leitner
2019-10-16 10:02         ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-16 11:13         ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-16 13:32           ` Ilya Maximets
2019-10-16 13:46             ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-10-16 14:02               ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-16 14:08                 ` Ilya Maximets
2019-10-16 14:14                   ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-16 14:05               ` Ilya Maximets [this message]
2019-10-29  9:02         ` David Marchand
2019-10-29 12:21           ` Flavio Leitner
2019-10-29 16:19             ` David Marchand

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=2b963349-66d9-179d-b480-6e15263733f3@ovn.org \
    --to=i.maximets@ovn.org \
    --cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=fbl@sysclose.org \
    --cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
    --cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
    --cc=michalx.obrembski@intel.com \
    --cc=shahafs@mellanox.com \
    --cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).