From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0F8BCA04BA; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:35:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D99351D149; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:35:24 +0200 (CEST) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [63.128.21.124]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EA771D148 for ; Fri, 2 Oct 2020 18:35:22 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1601656520; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8ULpf6UXuxA3ASSQFW46kbzccMHTmRKKsIZUxxP1E5Q=; b=TD2Jv5KVYBCQlyy2aMAOczrfBW8mFyGbTxVtFFlYeaOsmNYmj7QUs9uFGn5BQaUiFGpbnK /nqcWTD6EgPVrrnbys7O22HgUEI4dlpE5NUI8F0GoH1UYqaJi3KWGa2XTKla4D+H3YLyWd I22NpnTp/pxhQMnyDkUjCQG0/7Wm73I= Received: from mail-oo1-f69.google.com (mail-oo1-f69.google.com [209.85.161.69]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-12-VDfl3yIbOSeiFAWi_TidrQ-1; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 12:35:17 -0400 X-MC-Unique: VDfl3yIbOSeiFAWi_TidrQ-1 Received: by mail-oo1-f69.google.com with SMTP id h23so1000823oof.6 for ; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:35:17 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding :content-language; bh=8ULpf6UXuxA3ASSQFW46kbzccMHTmRKKsIZUxxP1E5Q=; b=ObVL/nHjUMZDmlOmA1CYDiDNlxhGxuqg0tF3giGmAXmm8FX6YmtunBh0pfktR6v/Iv 1tcXwsQ2H01Hb4dopxswSPhVIeIa1Bw/OdEeQ5UKjc13bWmPHIEeIjYPAUnw3XDrfyiT X9I15o1Z5w0cpZd+48QxhmycZQOAwRMx5cWx/ErswT1UjZGG/gR4FpyXXolkMJp3g3bO UXfB8D0LLoWoGMYJHr5BGdv9GxOtIt2wcFlBzWQuRTf599M/wyFaBxAJxJoDmxf83iTY Y23kFeQ6EgImJYs6KX6dlGuXRcXxSLSBsMo0RLv+XSLGlckrzx7aHJt/2/VxcvNecgh7 qzAA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM531U2iRgKH8QAGSjhvj0+2Lat1qWDm6vYYmiyhh/JhwoxcVt75/G e/EPO6zJiMTx8MxKyLvEGsMgEPsGac1iHDww2QTB5LnZTSxoxNRZLwjhorB8EyVD7cn1qQu5wAJ k4L0= X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:164c:: with SMTP id h12mr2499204otr.48.1601656516377; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:35:16 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzbTs8/Wk3vMMzNQ6X/kra83XuAeckEahDbV5zr9RCtD4h5AOIKc7zRcpjhQTL6lDPZ4X6moQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6830:164c:: with SMTP id h12mr2499185otr.48.1601656516095; Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:35:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from trix.remote.csb (075-142-250-213.res.spectrum.com. [75.142.250.213]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i7sm458053oto.62.2020.10.02.09.35.14 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 02 Oct 2020 09:35:15 -0700 (PDT) To: Thomas Monjalon Cc: "Chautru, Nicolas" , "dev@dpdk.org" References: <20201001143030.9194-1-trix@redhat.com> <3460938.iZNE5J4TDP@thomas> <1dbf4aaf-7a77-101d-24ea-6e3faec6165f@redhat.com> <1985785.NsDeZ6iOcB@thomas> From: Tom Rix Message-ID: <2bdc59b5-820b-1cea-2d44-8ef489122366@redhat.com> Date: Fri, 2 Oct 2020 09:35:14 -0700 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1985785.NsDeZ6iOcB@thomas> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=trix@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: New Reviewer entry type added to MAINTAINERS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" On 10/2/20 8:41 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 02/10/2020 16:59, Tom Rix: >> On 10/1/20 2:54 PM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: >>> 01/10/2020 23:22, Chautru, Nicolas: >>>> From: trix@redhat.com >>>>> From: Tom Rix >>>>> >>>>> Copied from the Linux kernel MAINTAINERS file. >>>>> A Reviewer is designated person who wishes to review changes in areas of >>>>> interest. >>>>> >>>>> Added self as Reviewer for baseband. >>>>> >>>>> I am a Linux kernel Reviewer for the fpga n3000/vista creek which has >>>>> several bitstream based baseband devices. So I want to help out here as >>>>> well. >>>>> >>>>> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix >>>> Thanks for the help. >>>> Note that they are a few other BBDEV patches in flight for 20.11 on top of the acc100 PMD that you may want to be aware of. >>>> https://patches.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/?series=&submitter=chautru&state=&q=&archive=&delegate= >>>> >>>> Acked-by: Nicolas Chautru >>> [...] >>>>> Baseband API - EXPERIMENTAL >>>>> M: Nicolas Chautru >>>>> +R: Tom Rix >>> I don't understand the need of differenciating maintainer and reviewer. >>> If you are trusted enough, why not just being co-maintainer? >>> >> I want to help out with the reviews, the reviewer type makes clear this level of commitment. >> >> Maintainer is the next, higher level of commitment. >> >> >> Trust wise, this would allow the maintainer verify the reviewer does have the bandwidth to be responsive >> >> and effective before committing to sharing responsibility. > Sorry I fail to understand. > My understanding is that you want to be Cc > but not committing for responsibility. > Would it be the same if you create a mail filter on your side? > > This model is really not clear to me so I'm reluctant to add > such new category until I understand the benefit. > That's fine, i will change the patch and use the existing process. Tom