From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>,
Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>,
dev@dpdk.org, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
David Marchand <david.marchand@redhat.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/virtio-user: drop attribute "unused" for memory callback
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2019 12:09:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2beaa964-0f55-ad6f-1bd7-64c16f310192@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <67a72d5e-7682-d8f5-42ad-2f533521c1c2@intel.com>
On 21-Nov-19 8:58 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/21/2019 12:55 AM, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 11/19/19 8:12 AM, Tiwei Bie wrote:
>>> The "addr" param has been used since the event callbacks are enabled
>>> for external memory. So the "__rte_unused" should be dropped.
>>>
>>> Besides, slightly refine the coding style by consistently assuming
>>> tabs are 8 characters.
>>>
>>> Fixes: f32c7c9de961 ("malloc: enable event callbacks for external memory")
>>> Cc: stable@dpdk.org
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Tiwei Bie <tiwei.bie@intel.com>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c | 6 +++---
>>> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>>> index a4400e772..ea016e85d 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio/virtio_user/virtio_user_dev.c
>>> @@ -315,9 +315,9 @@ virtio_user_fill_intr_handle(struct virtio_user_dev *dev)
>>>
>>> static void
>>> virtio_user_mem_event_cb(enum rte_mem_event type __rte_unused,
>>> - const void *addr __rte_unused,
>>> - size_t len __rte_unused,
>>> - void *arg)
>>> + const void *addr,
>>> + size_t len __rte_unused,
>>> + void *arg)
>>> {
>>> struct virtio_user_dev *dev = arg;
>>> struct rte_memseg_list *msl;
>>>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin <maxime.coquelin@redhat.com>
>>
>> David or Ferruh, could you pick it directly?
>> I don't plan to prepare a branch as I have this single patch for next
>> -rc.
>
> I can get it, but can you please confirm that it is safe to go to rc4, since
> already missed rc3?
> Also can you please give your review/ack if you already reviewed.
>
I don't think there's anything unsafe about removing __rte_unused
parameter :) The code itself hasn't changed.
--
Thanks,
Anatoly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-21 12:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-19 7:12 Tiwei Bie
2019-11-21 0:55 ` Maxime Coquelin
2019-11-21 8:58 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-11-21 12:09 ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2019-11-21 13:04 ` Ferruh Yigit
2019-11-21 14:29 ` Ferruh Yigit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2beaa964-0f55-ad6f-1bd7-64c16f310192@intel.com \
--to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@dpdk.org \
--cc=tiwei.bie@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).