From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga03.intel.com (mga03.intel.com [134.134.136.65]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D044A2C60 for ; Thu, 23 Aug 2018 16:00:57 +0200 (CEST) X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 23 Aug 2018 07:00:56 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.53,278,1531810800"; d="scan'208";a="84309075" Received: from fyigit-mobl.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.221.56]) ([10.237.221.56]) by orsmga001.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Aug 2018 07:00:54 -0700 To: Jack Min , "dev@dpdk.org" Cc: Thomas Monjalon , Adrien Mazarguil , "Xueming(Steven) Li" , Shahaf Shuler , Andrew Rybchenko References: From: Ferruh Yigit Openpgp: preference=signencrypt Message-ID: <2d087000-8e07-4c31-eeea-1fd5e90b6cfa@intel.com> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 15:00:53 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC] ethdev: add generic TTL rewrite actions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2018 14:00:58 -0000 On 8/7/2018 3:20 PM, Jack Min wrote: > There is a need to rewrite TTL by decrease or just set it directly, > and it's not necessary to check if the final result is zero or not. > > This is slightly different from the one defined by openflow and > make the actions more generic. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Xiaoyu Min Looks good to me. Can we use existing testpmd commands to test these new actions?