From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga06.intel.com (mga06.intel.com [134.134.136.31]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 229457D3B; Mon, 21 Aug 2017 10:23:27 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by orsmga104.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2017 01:23:26 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.41,408,1498546800"; d="scan'208";a="121068960" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.57]) ([10.237.220.57]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 21 Aug 2017 01:23:25 -0700 To: Yuanhan Liu , Kevin Traynor Cc: dpdk stable , dev@dpdk.org References: <20170818104545.GN9612@yliu-home> <20170821034011.GO9612@yliu-home> From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <2d8dbb48-978f-94fb-1282-8b5c4ea30220@intel.com> Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 09:23:24 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20170821034011.GO9612@yliu-home> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] 16.11.3 (LTS) patches review and test X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 21 Aug 2017 08:23:28 -0000 On 8/21/2017 4:40 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: > On Fri, Aug 18, 2017 at 06:29:02PM +0100, Kevin Traynor wrote: >> On 08/18/2017 11:45 AM, Yuanhan Liu wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Here is a list of patches targeted for LTS release 16.11.3. Please >>> help review and test. The planned date for the final release is 30th, >>> Aug. Before that, please let me know if anyone has objections with >>> these patches being applied. >>> >>> These patches are located at branch 16.11 of dpdk-stable repo: >>> http://dpdk.org/browse/dpdk-stable/ >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> --yliu >>> >> >> Hi Yuanhan, >> >> I think this one should go in too, as OVS hits this and writes back the >> wrong watermark value to the shared register which can cause problems >> for other ports. I've applied and tested it with DPDK 16.11. >> >> commit 0e61ab56e01655f02bfe4e6249e032e864b0f5dd >> Author: Qi Zhang >> Date: Thu Aug 10 18:48:07 2017 +0800 >> >> net/i40e: fix flow control watermark mismatch >> >> Flow control watermark is not read out correctly, >> that may cause an application who not intend to change >> watermark but does change it with a rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_set >> call right after rte_eth_dev_flow_ctrl_get. > > Weird, I couldn't find this commit: > > $ git show 0e61ab56e01655f02bfe4e6249e032e864b0f5dd > fatal: bad object 0e61ab56e01655f02bfe4e6249e032e864b0f5dd The commit is in next-net. Not sure how to proceed, any idea? > > --yliu >