From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mga01.intel.com (mga01.intel.com [192.55.52.88]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7601E5A0A for ; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 11:06:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from orsmga004.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.38]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Sep 2016 02:05:00 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,381,1470726000"; d="scan'208";a="12901973" Received: from fyigit-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.237.220.63]) ([10.237.220.63]) by orsmga004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 23 Sep 2016 02:04:59 -0700 To: Thomas Monjalon References: <1473337981-27378-1-git-send-email-ferruh.yigit@intel.com> <6873211.QDWnoOkD9j@xps13> Cc: dev@dpdk.org From: Ferruh Yigit Message-ID: <2e084452-347c-4553-4343-024a10412639@intel.com> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 10:04:58 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6873211.QDWnoOkD9j@xps13> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] mk: remove module compilation noise X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 09:06:03 -0000 On 9/23/2016 12:35 AM, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > 2016-09-08 13:33, Ferruh Yigit: >> Following log generated by Linux kernel Makefiles: >> (cat /dev/null; echo >> kernel/.../build/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/igb_uio.ko;) > >> .../build/lib/librte_eal/linuxapp/igb_uio/modules.order >> >> This happens because $(Q) used for both Linux and DPDK makefiles and >> DPDK unsets this variable when V=0, which makes Linux verbose. >> >> More details: >> rte.modules calls kernel makefile with V=0 argument >> kernel makefile includes igb_uio/Makefile, which includes rte.vars.mk >> rte.vars.mk unsets Q when V=0 > > Yes good analysis. > Another consequence is that V=0 is equivalent to V=1 (verbose mode). Yes. > I think it is better to fix the latter issue. I'll send a patch. OK.