From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38121A0543; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 17:17:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from mails.dpdk.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A37E40684; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 17:17:20 +0100 (CET) Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B6AE400D6 for ; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 17:17:18 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1671034637; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=PnTIYvS7mGS3MdzXRwCm/mKOIsqLYMwNsDMJLT29I4E=; b=BTrPuTokpgdoHFqFcHh5zmx2cNhMq5hPQpEWySMToK6NXBtiVc3rjZqtvSfCzIvYc41ieR 1fc1eijPcDUA98OJcSZh7KI3nE9zzxl86/T5eS0pNlHUDGt4SM+jJ42L7SrucAdGFkHYTP 8whG2GeVhy7rn3JCIm3vtw0aCZRkPt0= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-145-pcoJXHtpOoyPb7kDW2Mkgg-1; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 11:17:13 -0500 X-MC-Unique: pcoJXHtpOoyPb7kDW2Mkgg-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx07.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 072AE3C02534; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:17:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.39.208.32] (unknown [10.39.208.32]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E792014171BE; Wed, 14 Dec 2022 16:17:11 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: <2e7c1dc2-9b8c-9e80-05aa-ab26ccefb7b6@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2022 17:17:08 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.5.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] test/bbdev: explicit check for allocation failure To: Nicolas Chautru , dev@dpdk.org Cc: hernan.vargas@intel.com, Vipin.Varghese@amd.com, stable@dpdk.org References: <20221213161855.12970-1-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> <20221213161855.12970-4-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> From: Maxime Coquelin In-Reply-To: <20221213161855.12970-4-nicolas.chautru@intel.com> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.7 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org On 12/13/22 17:18, Nicolas Chautru wrote: > Adding check for error on return of the > rte_bbdev_*_op_alloc_bulk calls in bbdev-test. > > Fixes: f714a18885a6 ("app/testbbdev: add test application for bbdev") > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Chautru > --- > app/test-bbdev/test_bbdev_perf.c | 9 ++++++--- > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > Reviewed-by: Maxime Coquelin Thanks, Maxime