From: "Ariel Otilibili-Anieli" <otilibil@eurecom.fr>
To: "Stephen Hemminger" <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Thomas Monjalon" <thomas@monjalon.net>,
"David Marchand" <david.marchand@redhat.com>,
"Cristian Dumitrescu" <cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] app/test: remove useless calls to rte_bitmap_free
Date: Fri, 13 Dec 2024 22:38:42 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2f7a8b-675ca980-4faf-be99fc0@178539190> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241213085928.0f2f2de1@hermes.local>
On Friday, December 13, 2024 17:59 CET, Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> On Fri, 13 Dec 2024 12:30:00 +0100
> Ariel Otilibili <otilibil@eurecom.fr> wrote:
>
> > * rte_bitmap_free is only useful for its return value
> > * and its return value is not used.
> >
> > ```
> > $ < lib/eal/include/rte_bitmap.h sed -ne '/bitmap_free/,/^}/p'
> >
> > rte_bitmap_free(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
> > {
> > /* Check input arguments */
> > if (bmp == NULL) {
> > return -1;
> > }
> >
> > return 0;
> > }
> > ```
> >
> > Reported-by: Coverity, IDs 357712 & 357737
> > Signed-off-by: Ariel Otilibili <otilibil@eurecom.fr>
> > ---
> > app/test/test_bitmap.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/app/test/test_bitmap.c b/app/test/test_bitmap.c
> > index bab11812c7..a21210a215 100644
> > --- a/app/test/test_bitmap.c
> > +++ b/app/test/test_bitmap.c
> > @@ -208,7 +208,6 @@ test_bitmap_all_clear(void)
> > if (test_bitmap_scan_operations(bmp) < 0)
> > return TEST_FAILED;
> >
> > - rte_bitmap_free(bmp);
> > rte_free(mem);
> >
> > return TEST_SUCCESS;
> > @@ -254,7 +253,6 @@ test_bitmap_all_set(void)
> > return TEST_FAILED;
> > }
> >
> > - rte_bitmap_free(bmp);
> > rte_free(mem);
> >
> > return TEST_SUCCESS;
>
> I would rather that, rte_bitmap_free() be made a real function
> which would shutup Coverity.
>
> And rte_bitmap_free() should just be a void function, like all the
> other XXX_free() variants in DPDK.
I will work on a Version 3 of this series, Stephen; your feedback landed into Version 1.
For my understanding, on which of the XXX_free should I model a rte_bitmap_free returning void?
Here are the occurrences of rte_bitmap_free()
```
$ git grep -Pn 'rte_bitmap_free\('
app/test/test_bitmap.c:211: rte_bitmap_free(bmp);
app/test/test_bitmap.c:257: rte_bitmap_free(bmp);
devtools/cocci/nullfree.cocci:19:- if (E != NULL) rte_bitmap_free(E);
devtools/cocci/nullfree.cocci:20:+ rte_bitmap_free(E);
drivers/common/mlx5/mlx5_common_mr.c:497: rte_bitmap_free(mr->ms_bmp);
drivers/crypto/ionic/ionic_crypto_main.c:817: rte_bitmap_free(dev->sess_bm);
drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_pmd.c:2246: rte_bitmap_free(internals->vlan_filter_bmp);
drivers/net/cxgbe/cxgbe_main.c:468: rte_bitmap_free(t->ftid_bmap);
drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4_mr.c:474: rte_bitmap_free(mr->ms_bmp);
drivers/net/netvsc/hn_rxtx.c:186: rte_bitmap_free(hv->chim_bmap);
drivers/net/sfc/sfc_sw_stats.c:818: rte_bitmap_free(sa->sw_stats.queues_bitmap);
lib/eal/include/rte_bitmap.h:291:rte_bitmap_free(struct rte_bitmap *bmp)
```
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-13 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-13 11:29 [PATCH 0/1] " Ariel Otilibili
2024-12-13 11:30 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Ariel Otilibili
2024-12-13 16:59 ` Stephen Hemminger
2024-12-13 21:38 ` Ariel Otilibili-Anieli [this message]
2024-12-13 11:38 ` [v2 0/1] " Ariel Otilibili
2024-12-13 11:38 ` [v2 1/1] " Ariel Otilibili
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2f7a8b-675ca980-4faf-be99fc0@178539190 \
--to=otilibil@eurecom.fr \
--cc=cristian.dumitrescu@intel.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=thomas@monjalon.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).