From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: chetan bhasin <chetan.bhasin017@gmail.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com,
Chas Williams <chas3@att.com>,
gaetan.rivet@6wind.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] How to use mlx4 as bond
Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2019 01:51:43 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3003267.NZbS04Euqv@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CACZZ+Y7pBGkuc3yczB++xUTORf59BxYmqQPaDUjBovZj8k9sQg@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
26/03/2019 16:36, chetan bhasin:
> Hi,
>
> I am using DPDK 17.11.4 with a Mellanox ConnectX-3 Pro dual port card, one
> of the features of this card is that both ports have the same PCI address.
> i.e. there are two ports here but only one PCI reported:
>
> # lspci | grep -i mell
> 0a:00.0 Ethernet controller: Mellanox Technologies MT27520 Family
> [ConnectX-3 Pro]
>
> Is there any way to configure DPDK to set up bonding with this card?
> Bonding requires two unique PCI addresses, is there a way to tell DPDK
> about the two interfaces other than via PCI? I am using VPP to interface
> with DPDK and set up the bonding via vdev configuration. Is bonding just
> not possible using the two interfaces on this device?
It is a design mistake to use PCI address to select slave ports for bonding.
It prevents using multi-port devices or non-PCI devices (like vdev).
The solution is to use another format, like the new devargs syntax,
which allows to match more properties (PCI address being one property).
For ConnectX-3 Pro, it will allow to choose ports by MAC address
with this string: "class=eth,mac=00:11:22:33:44:55"
Unfortunately, this solution requires a patch in the bonding PMD
to use RTE_ETH_FOREACH_MATCHING_DEV().
Note that RTE_ETH_FOREACH_MATCHING_DEV supports the old PCI-only syntax.
Would you like to make it a try?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-03-27 0:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-03-26 15:36 chetan bhasin
2019-03-26 15:36 ` chetan bhasin
2019-03-27 0:51 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-03-27 0:51 ` Thomas Monjalon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3003267.NZbS04Euqv@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=chas3@att.com \
--cc=chetan.bhasin017@gmail.com \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=gaetan.rivet@6wind.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).