* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes
@ 2019-11-11 7:46 Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2020-07-30 21:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula @ 2019-11-11 7:46 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David Marchand
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Marko Kovacevic, Ori Kam,
Bruce Richardson, Radu Nicolau, Akhil Goyal, Tomasz Kantecki,
dev
>On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:23 AM <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> wrote:
>>
>> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>>
>> Increase the number of routes from 8 to 16 that are statically added
>for
>> lpm and em mode as most of the SoCs support more than 8
>interfaces.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>> ---
>> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 72
>++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 16 +++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
>b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
>> index 74a7c8fa4..c07a5b937 100644
>> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
>> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
>> @@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ static struct ipv4_l3fwd_em_route
>ipv4_l3fwd_em_route_array[] = {
>> {{RTE_IPV4(201, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 1},
>> {{RTE_IPV4(111, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 2},
>> {{RTE_IPV4(211, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 3},
>> + {{RTE_IPV4(121, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 10, 0, 1), 101, 11,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 4},
>> + {{RTE_IPV4(221, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 5},
>> + {{RTE_IPV4(131, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 6},
>> + {{RTE_IPV4(231, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 7},
>> + {{RTE_IPV4(141, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 8},
>> + {{RTE_IPV4(241, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 9},
>> + {{RTE_IPV4(151, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 10},
>> + {{RTE_IPV4(251, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 11},
>> + {{RTE_IPV4(161, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 12},
>> + {{RTE_IPV4(261, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
>IPPROTO_TCP}, 13},
>
>Am I reading this correctly ? 261.0.0.0 ?
My bad. Do you think it's better to change the address to 198.18.0.0/15 block as it
would be inline with RFC as well as LPM addresses?
>
>
>--
>David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes
2019-11-11 7:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
@ 2020-07-30 21:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Thomas Monjalon @ 2020-07-30 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
Cc: David Marchand, dev, Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Marko Kovacevic,
Ori Kam, Bruce Richardson, Radu Nicolau, Akhil Goyal,
Tomasz Kantecki, dev
11/11/2019 08:46, Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula:
> >On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:23 AM <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> >>
> >> Increase the number of routes from 8 to 16 that are statically added
> >for
> >> lpm and em mode as most of the SoCs support more than 8
> >interfaces.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> >> ---
> >> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 72
> >++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 16 +++++++++
> >> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> >b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> >> index 74a7c8fa4..c07a5b937 100644
> >> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> >> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> >> @@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ static struct ipv4_l3fwd_em_route
> >ipv4_l3fwd_em_route_array[] = {
> >> {{RTE_IPV4(201, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 1},
> >> {{RTE_IPV4(111, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 2},
> >> {{RTE_IPV4(211, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 3},
> >> + {{RTE_IPV4(121, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 10, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 4},
> >> + {{RTE_IPV4(221, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 5},
> >> + {{RTE_IPV4(131, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 6},
> >> + {{RTE_IPV4(231, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 7},
> >> + {{RTE_IPV4(141, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 8},
> >> + {{RTE_IPV4(241, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 9},
> >> + {{RTE_IPV4(151, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 10},
> >> + {{RTE_IPV4(251, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 11},
> >> + {{RTE_IPV4(161, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 12},
> >> + {{RTE_IPV4(261, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12,
> >IPPROTO_TCP}, 13},
> >
> >Am I reading this correctly ? 261.0.0.0 ?
>
> My bad. Do you think it's better to change the address to 198.18.0.0/15 block as it
> would be inline with RFC as well as LPM addresses?
After 9 months, I think you could send a v2 ;)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes
2019-10-30 5:23 pbhagavatula
@ 2019-11-08 8:51 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: David Marchand @ 2019-11-08 8:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Pavan Nikhilesh
Cc: Jerin Jacob Kollanukkaran, Marko Kovacevic, Ori Kam,
Bruce Richardson, Radu Nicolau, Akhil Goyal, Tomasz Kantecki,
dev
On Wed, Oct 30, 2019 at 6:23 AM <pbhagavatula@marvell.com> wrote:
>
> From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
>
> Increase the number of routes from 8 to 16 that are statically added for
> lpm and em mode as most of the SoCs support more than 8 interfaces.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
> ---
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 16 +++++++++
> 2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> index 74a7c8fa4..c07a5b937 100644
> --- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> +++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
> @@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ static struct ipv4_l3fwd_em_route ipv4_l3fwd_em_route_array[] = {
> {{RTE_IPV4(201, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 1},
> {{RTE_IPV4(111, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 2},
> {{RTE_IPV4(211, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 3},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(121, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 10, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 4},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(221, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 5},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(131, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 6},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(231, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 7},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(141, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 8},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(241, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 9},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(151, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 10},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(251, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 11},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(161, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 12},
> + {{RTE_IPV4(261, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 13},
Am I reading this correctly ? 261.0.0.0 ?
--
David Marchand
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
* [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes
@ 2019-10-30 5:23 pbhagavatula
2019-11-08 8:51 ` David Marchand
0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: pbhagavatula @ 2019-10-30 5:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: jerinj, Marko Kovacevic, Ori Kam, Bruce Richardson, Radu Nicolau,
Akhil Goyal, Tomasz Kantecki
Cc: dev, Pavan Nikhilesh
From: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
Increase the number of routes from 8 to 16 that are statically added for
lpm and em mode as most of the SoCs support more than 8 interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Pavan Nikhilesh <pbhagavatula@marvell.com>
---
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c | 16 +++++++++
2 files changed, 88 insertions(+)
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
index 74a7c8fa4..c07a5b937 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_em.c
@@ -103,6 +103,18 @@ static struct ipv4_l3fwd_em_route ipv4_l3fwd_em_route_array[] = {
{{RTE_IPV4(201, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 1},
{{RTE_IPV4(111, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 2},
{{RTE_IPV4(211, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 3},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(121, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 10, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 4},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(221, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 20, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 5},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(131, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 6},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(231, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 7},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(141, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 8},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(241, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 9},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(151, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 10},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(251, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 11},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(161, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 12},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(261, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 13},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(171, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(100, 30, 0, 1), 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 14},
+ {{RTE_IPV4(271, 0, 0, 0), RTE_IPV4(200, 40, 0, 1), 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 15},
};
static struct ipv6_l3fwd_em_route ipv6_l3fwd_em_route_array[] = {
@@ -125,6 +137,66 @@ static struct ipv6_l3fwd_em_route ipv6_l3fwd_em_route_array[] = {
{0xfe, 0xb0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
{0xfe, 0xb0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 3},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0xc0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0xc0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 4},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0xd0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0xd0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 5},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0xe0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0xe0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 6},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0xf0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0xf0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 7},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0x81, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0x81, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 8},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0x92, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0x92, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 9},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0xa3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0xa3, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 10},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0xb4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0xb4, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 11},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0xc5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0xc5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 12},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0xd6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0xd6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 13},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0xe7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0xe7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 101, 11, IPPROTO_TCP}, 14},
+
+ {{
+ {0xfe, 0xf8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1e, 0x67, 0xff, 0xfe, 0, 0, 0},
+ {0xfe, 0xf8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0x02, 0x1b, 0x21, 0xff, 0xfe, 0x91, 0x38, 0x05},
+ 102, 12, IPPROTO_TCP}, 15},
};
struct rte_hash *ipv4_l3fwd_em_lookup_struct[NB_SOCKETS];
diff --git a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
index a3a65f7fc..ace5823b5 100644
--- a/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
+++ b/examples/l3fwd/l3fwd_lpm.c
@@ -51,6 +51,14 @@ static struct ipv4_l3fwd_lpm_route ipv4_l3fwd_lpm_route_array[] = {
{RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 5, 0), 24, 5},
{RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 6, 0), 24, 6},
{RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 7, 0), 24, 7},
+ {RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 8, 0), 24, 8},
+ {RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 9, 0), 24, 9},
+ {RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 10, 0), 24, 10},
+ {RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 11, 0), 24, 11},
+ {RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 12, 0), 24, 12},
+ {RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 13, 0), 24, 13},
+ {RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 14, 0), 24, 14},
+ {RTE_IPV4(192, 18, 15, 0), 24, 15},
};
/* 2001:0200::/48 is IANA reserved range for IPv6 benchmarking (RFC5180) */
@@ -63,6 +71,14 @@ static struct ipv6_l3fwd_lpm_route ipv6_l3fwd_lpm_route_array[] = {
{{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 5, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 5},
{{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 6, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 6},
{{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 7, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 7},
+ {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 8, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 8},
+ {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 9, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 9},
+ {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 10, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 10},
+ {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 11, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 11},
+ {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 12, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 12},
+ {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 13, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 13},
+ {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 14, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 14},
+ {{32, 1, 2, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 15, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, 48, 15},
};
#define IPV4_L3FWD_LPM_NUM_ROUTES \
--
2.17.1
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2020-07-30 21:28 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2019-11-11 7:46 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH 1/2] examples/l3fwd: increase number of routes Pavan Nikhilesh Bhagavatula
2020-07-30 21:28 ` Thomas Monjalon
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-10-30 5:23 pbhagavatula
2019-11-08 8:51 ` David Marchand
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).