DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Stephen Hemminger <sthemmin@microsoft.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC 02/14] virtio: use eth_link_read/write (and bug fix)
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 16:04:23 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3049472.WSApEpTIyO@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170717092836.0d8932fc@xeon-e3>

17/07/2017 18:28, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Mon, 17 Jul 2017 19:14:16 +0300
> Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> wrote:
> 
> > On 07/17/2017 07:01 PM, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > > On Sun, 16 Jul 2017 15:33:26 +0300
> > > Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com> wrote:
> > >  
> > >>> +	link.link_autoneg = ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED;  
> > >> As I understand link_autoneg is 1 bit field with boolean semantics. I.e. 0/false - no autoneg, 1/true - autoneg.
> > >> It looks like it has wrong comment:
> > >>           uint16_t link_autoneg : 1;  /**< ETH_LINK_SPEED_[AUTONEG/FIXED] */
> > >>
> > >> since
> > >> #define ETH_LINK_SPEED_AUTONEG  (0 <<  0)  /**< Autonegotiate (all speeds) */
> > >> #define ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED    (1 <<  0)  /**< Disable autoneg (fixed speed) */
> > >>
> > >> whereas
> > >> #define ETH_LINK_FIXED          0 /**< No autonegotiation. */
> > >> #define ETH_LINK_AUTONEG        1 /**< Autonegotiated. */
> > >>
> > >> In general this attempt to introduce bug is the result of wrong comment which is caused by very similar
> > >> defines with opposite values.  
> > > Orignal observation was because some drivers (vmxnet3) were setting autoneg = fixed
> > > and others were not. Turns out it makes no difference
> > > since FIXED == 0, the old code and new code have same effect.  
> > 
> > May be I miss something, but  ETH_LINK_SPEED_FIXED==1, but 
> > ETH_LINK_FIXED==0.
> > So, initially it was 0 (fixed speed), but now it is 1 (autoneg).
> 
> My understanding is that ETH_SPEED_XXX and ETH_LINK_FIXED are for rte_eth_link
> structure; and ETH_LINK_SPEED_XXX values are for dev_info->speed_capa

Right.
The comment is wrong.
rte_eth_link.link_autoneg must uses ETH_LINK_[FIXED/AUTONEG]
ETH_LINK_SPEED_[AUTONEG/FIXED] is for rte_eth_conf.link_speeds
and for rte_eth_dev_info.speed_capa.

So in this patch, you should set link.link_autoneg = ETH_LINK_FIXED.

I will send a patch to fix the comment in ethdev.

  reply	other threads:[~2018-01-05 15:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-07-14 18:30 [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/14] link status API improvement and bugfixes Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 01/14] ethdev: add link status read/write functions Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-16 13:26   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-07-17 15:58     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-17 16:12       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-07-17 16:21         ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-17 16:31           ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-10-11  8:32   ` Yang, Qiming
2017-10-13 15:12     ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-01-05 14:24       ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-05 20:15         ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 02/14] virtio: use eth_link_read/write (and bug fix) Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-16 12:33   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-07-17 16:01     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-17 16:14       ` [dpdk-dev] ***Spam*** " Andrew Rybchenko
2017-07-17 16:28         ` [dpdk-dev] " Stephen Hemminger
2018-01-05 15:04           ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 03/14] bnxt: use rte_link_update Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 04/14] vmxnet3: use rte_eth_link_update Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 05/14] dpaa2: " Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 06/14] nfp: " Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 07/14] e1000: " Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 08/14] ixgbe: " Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 09/14] sfc: use new rte_eth_link helpers Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-16 13:48   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-07-17 16:02     ` Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-17 16:19       ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 10/14] i40e: use rte_eth_link_update (and bug fix) Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 11/14] liquidio: use _rte_eth_link_update Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-18 10:17   ` Shijith Thotton
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 12/14] thunderx: " Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 13/14] szedata: " Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-16 12:46   ` Andrew Rybchenko
2017-07-14 18:30 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 14/14] enic: " Stephen Hemminger
2017-07-16 13:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [RFC 00/14] link status API improvement and bugfixes Andrew Rybchenko
2018-01-05 14:29 ` Thomas Monjalon
2018-01-05 20:18   ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3049472.WSApEpTIyO@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=sthemmin@microsoft.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).