From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 59623A04BA; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:09:25 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF2D21DAD7; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:09:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from new4-smtp.messagingengine.com (new4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.230]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 392271DAD4; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 17:09:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E4375802E3; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 11:09:19 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 01 Oct 2020 11:09:19 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= fIsvObd8bMsLJ72Oarz3dfls3tXWFAxn43/AQMLY2vk=; b=AmoAAzcLfbr+dsgk mgRP/xL6tlC3H36QL+omFMWzG3Xs3fgZiriCyKbtEdM4ey31au8TZnpxXgz+LNku 1upX+upP8qEuYeWB1laVXBKT9JBZ/B/kwwOrSoEwes/Fyk6N7d+MpEI1wLpNxP4a 0e3ZcDFsIlWb+ZjIQiLUfenmKyoQq0DTx8Ae3wvkEMsypDf1BQwT6jmAv5iyi/rc BQyjXkB3b4IqzoWMo9dAGis1GwVKT0cbBG6J+wWIun8tnVLQQ7QA6fUcrSOkSCVL WFC0nthuLpekKjZ/erjIHgXasaUXcIjmaB/ABxBMX6qKiLqegzPziYHVI7Ril0tW SG66AQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=fIsvObd8bMsLJ72Oarz3dfls3tXWFAxn43/AQMLY2 vk=; b=B/Ue9+Cvlxy7u0xQ+BLz85t5+ynL4EMqoZoi7crF+kIGe0yq5N6k2U2tk ay0ZvS0vcNFgcwn6kDe0IXWyZ6ZPFvS2hFmTp2beRtSeX3IcNi0Vy25PNBs1cJxs 6pcFLPo9ePYkR48EE7F3ZcNejmPw2BWqlSFz+aqV0Eaib9vdCmUflGO3lCXS1yFU DWRtrhyrounLEPA8Jls8FgChDL7qgSrer0uc3VxE/uPeYlBvbr+bQQcHErhRYrmz C6XF1m2WJ+T5R+JthwvkuqtLyglvODFpMwJIaeWALH53DSMbOr3cqETY1nWYzMxQ p7YzvWaC5awOfvmETFSTkavactRig== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrfeeggdekiecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 830AE306467E; Thu, 1 Oct 2020 11:09:17 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Ciara Power Cc: dev@dpdk.org, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, akhil.goyal@nxp.com, david.marchand@redhat.com, jerinj@marvell.com, ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, rasland@nvidia.com, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, qi.z.zhang@intel.com, techboard@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2020 17:09:15 +0200 Message-ID: <3057910.f0htRjhIWb@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200921135931.13355-1-ciara.power@intel.com> References: <20200807123009.21266-1-ciara.power@intel.com> <20200921135931.13355-1-ciara.power@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/20] remove make support in DPDK X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" > This patchset includes the remaining 18 patches that were not > merged along with the others in v4, pending rework and more review. > *All*, please make the documentation update your highest priority. > > v5: > - Added patch to update cheatsheet. > - Added patch to update release notes. > - Fixed outstanding comments on v3/v4. We are progressing. The first six patches of this v5 are merged with discussed updates. Most of the remaining patches are about drivers. We miss drivers maintainers to review the changes to their doc. PLEASE REVIEW One way of doing global changes could be to ask all maintainers to do their own cleanup. But Ciara did the global cleanup already. All you have to do is to review and give feedbacks. Why is it so complicate to get reviews? Probably maintainers don't read such patches where they are Cc'ed. In order to avoid such situations making global changes difficult, I think we should block merging of drivers patches until drivers maintainers do their job.