From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f181.google.com (mail-wi0-f181.google.com
 [209.85.212.181]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93E155946
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:32:57 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f181.google.com with SMTP id e4so449342wiv.14
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=+wouN7oAL4gnBSgU7y1HBY+cbA3MxtENERT9pegWTzs=;
 b=GWEIrvrWckAX/Q9C73ryFNHx6ZeZG+5iHF5lmFZo25gOhteN+PBiNVVokYfZFHGPEi
 0G3t/BVnMX3ikuaaBWA2Q5bIx3ZSqr7Ce6R84ndjUANedeVPBh+n5cyTw5hS/rbNo/wh
 r5WLWDl/lUrdEKFPP11yHvGvVSy5pYYyJ2ESA0g52RFYYlfYMWFRl9ZtSJXtY6aVRRfe
 7L1G9qYpD5K38wYEqBzbd/0/+/Ivyv4DQz1+AJ0weGfjX2t3fC4pRrd8OlOMzSzdr9r1
 /9qK+Hk8yYLEJq544C3OniRN98WuTUQVZdJfzzo49EEtkyaxPfCk1a3pyS4yTyrCKdd1
 2KcQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQncbKDni0KeCWusDqWs/14d1A/mVr1cSt+PLKBJBoUxX2yax+T5+IbCUp5VIrVcxrBLLS6A
X-Received: by 10.181.13.116 with SMTP id ex20mr4197845wid.31.1409215025739;
 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (guy78-3-82-239-227-177.fbx.proxad.net.
 [82.239.227.177])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id xt6sm8083210wjc.14.2014.08.28.01.37.04
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Thu, 28 Aug 2014 01:37:05 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Liu, Jijiang" <jijiang.liu@intel.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 10:36:58 +0200
Message-ID: <3070853.Eook8YoHL0@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.13.3 (Linux/3.15.8-1-ARCH; KDE/4.13.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D6319C@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1409038294-21693-1-git-send-email-jijiang.liu@intel.com>
 <3586297.ZW2M4AoP7m@xps13>
 <1ED644BD7E0A5F4091CF203DAFB8E4CC01D6319C@SHSMSX101.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 3/7]rte_ether:add API of VxLAN packet
	filter in librte_ether
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2014 08:32:57 -0000

2014-08-28 00:55, Liu, Jijiang:
> From: Thomas Monjalon [mailto:thomas.monjalon@6wind.com]
> > I wonder if we could use a common function to set all kind of filters?
> > 
> > Thoughts are welcome.
> 
> The rte_eth_dev_tunnel_filter_set() is a common filter function for
> tunneling packet, which can set all kind of filters.

I understand that. But my question was: could we have common functions for
tunnel filters and (existing) generic filters?

-- 
Thomas