DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: dev@dpdk.org, chas3@att.com
Cc: zhangliang@bigo.sg, chenchanghu@huawei.com,
	jerry.lilijun@huawei.com, haifeng.lin@huawei.com,
	guohongzhi1@huawei.com, luyicai <luyicai@huawei.com>,
	luyicai <luyicai@huawei.com>,
	ferruh.yigit@intel.com, matan@mellanox.com, rasland@mellanox.com
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] drivers/net/bonding: fix bug for lacp negotiation failed
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 12:43:57 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3071696.IbEkSYjo7c@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1589887092-26360-1-git-send-email-luyicai@huawei.com>

Any review please?

19/05/2020 13:18, luyicai:
> When two host is connected directly without any devices like switch,
> and also enable dedicated tx/rx queues on bonding devices slaves,
> rx_machine_update would recieving partner lacp negotiation packets,
> which partner's port mac filled with zeros. So in this situation,
> it would never go rx_machine branch with correct mac!
> Thus bond mode 4 will negotiation failed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: luyicai <luyicai@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> index b77a37d..2002ec0 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/bonding/rte_eth_bond_8023ad.c
> @@ -798,7 +798,8 @@
>  		RTE_ASSERT(lacp->lacpdu.subtype == SLOW_SUBTYPE_LACP);
>  
>  		partner = &lacp->lacpdu.partner;
> -		if (rte_is_same_ether_addr(&partner->port_params.system,
> +		if (rte_is_zero_ether_addr(&partner->port_params.system) ||
> +			rte_is_same_ether_addr(&partner->port_params.system,
>  			&internals->mode4.mac_addr)) {
>  			/* This LACP frame is sending to the bonding port
>  			 * so pass it to rx_machine.
> 






  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-24 10:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-19 11:18 luyicai
2020-06-24 10:43 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-07-10 21:07   ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-07-11  1:42     ` Wei Hu (Xavier)
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-05-19  7:53 luyicai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3071696.IbEkSYjo7c@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=chas3@att.com \
    --cc=chenchanghu@huawei.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=guohongzhi1@huawei.com \
    --cc=haifeng.lin@huawei.com \
    --cc=jerry.lilijun@huawei.com \
    --cc=luyicai@huawei.com \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=rasland@mellanox.com \
    --cc=zhangliang@bigo.sg \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).