DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Euan Bourke <euan.bourke@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] doc: updated incorrect value for IP frag max fragments
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2023 12:41:08 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3099751.jZfb76A358@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20231221113242.3351356-1-euan.bourke@intel.com>

21/12/2023 12:32, Euan Bourke:
> -/* ip_fragmentation defines */
> +/* ip_fragmentation defines 8< */
>  #define RTE_LIBRTE_IP_FRAG_MAX_FRAG 8
> +/* >8 End of ip_fragmentation defines */
[...]
> +.. literalinclude:: ../../../config/rte_config.h
> +    :start-after: ip_fragmentation defines 8<
> +    :end-before: >8 End of ip_fragmentation defines

In v1 I asked to use "start-at". You didn't reply.
It is more convenient for a one-line include.
Don't you agree?



  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-12-21 11:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <https://inbox.dpdk.org/dev/20231219151754.3285058-1-euan.bourke@intel.com/>
2023-12-21 11:32 ` Euan Bourke
2023-12-21 11:32   ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ip_frag: updated name for IP frag define Euan Bourke
2023-12-21 11:39   ` [PATCH v2 1/2] doc: updated incorrect value for IP frag max fragments David Marchand
2023-12-21 11:41   ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2023-12-21 13:46     ` Bourke, Euan
2023-12-21 17:41   ` [PATCH v3 " Euan Bourke
2023-12-21 17:41     ` [PATCH v3 2/2] ip_frag: updated name for IP frag max frag define Euan Bourke
2023-12-22  9:08       ` Bruce Richardson
2024-01-08 11:36     ` [PATCH v4 1/2] doc: updated incorrect value for IP frag max fragments Euan Bourke
2024-01-08 11:36       ` [PATCH v4 2/2] ip_frag: updated name for IP frag define Euan Bourke
2024-10-09 18:38         ` Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3099751.jZfb76A358@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=euan.bourke@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).