From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: jerinj@marvell.com
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, maxime.coquelin@redhat.com, zhihong.wang@intel.com,
xiaolong.ye@intel.com, david.marchand@redhat.com,
hkalra@marvell.com, Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] bus/pci: optimize pci device probe
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2020 20:08:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3102527.CAdn2TfLgq@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200426173811.49788-1-jerinj@marvell.com>
26/04/2020 19:38, jerinj@marvell.com:
> From: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
>
> If the PCI device is not attached to any driver then there is no
> point in probing it. As an optimization, skip the PCI device probe if
> the PCI device driver of type RTE_KDRV_NONE.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>
> ---
> Notes:
> ------
> - virtio drivers does special treatment based on RTE_KDRV_UNKNOWN, That is
> the reason allowing RTE_KDRV_UNKNOWN in this patch.
> - virio devices uses RTE_KDRV_UNKNOWN for some special meaning, IMO, if it would
> be better, if
> a) Introduce the KDRV for virio
> b) If the PCIe device of driver type NONE or UNKNOWN then not even add in pci
> list
> in the scan, It will improve the boot time by avoiding operation on
> unwanted device like sorting the PCI devices, scanning it, probe it, managing
> it etc.
mlx4/mlx4 uses RTE_KDRV_UNKNOWN.
> - Initial problem reported at http://patches.dpdk.org/patch/64999/ as
> boot time printf clutter on octeontx2 devices with a lot PCI devices which are
> of type RTE_KDRV_NONE.
Add a logtype for PCI driver and adjust log level accordingly
to your preferences.
> @@ -271,6 +271,8 @@ pci_probe_all_drivers(struct rte_pci_device *dev)
> FOREACH_DRIVER_ON_PCIBUS(dr) {
> + if (dev->kdrv == RTE_KDRV_NONE)
> + continue;
> rc = rte_pci_probe_one_driver(dr, dev);
Nack
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-04-26 18:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-26 17:38 jerinj
2020-04-26 18:08 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-04-26 18:41 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-26 20:06 ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-04-27 17:59 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-04-28 8:50 ` David Marchand
2020-04-28 9:34 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 15:50 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-05 16:16 ` David Marchand
2020-05-06 6:34 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-05-06 6:43 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-06 7:52 ` Maxime Coquelin
2020-05-06 10:51 ` Jerin Jacob
2020-05-06 11:37 ` David Marchand
2020-05-06 11:44 ` Maxime Coquelin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3102527.CAdn2TfLgq@thomas \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=david.marchand@redhat.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=hkalra@marvell.com \
--cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
--cc=maxime.coquelin@redhat.com \
--cc=xiaolong.ye@intel.com \
--cc=zhihong.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).