DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Yaron Illouz <yaroni@radcom.com>
Cc: "users@dpdk.org" <users@dpdk.org>, "dev@dpdk.org" <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Konstantin Ananyev <konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru>,
	Radu Nicolau <radu.nicolau@intel.com>,
	Akhil Goyal <gakhil@marvell.com>, Kai Ji <kai.ji@intel.com>,
	Anoob Joseph <anoobj@marvell.com>
Subject: Re: ipsec on dpdk
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 12:39:30 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3105959.ktpJ11cQ8Q@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <AM9PR09MB49953F54F5C999BB0871C97CA1B62@AM9PR09MB4995.eurprd09.prod.outlook.com>

Hello,

Adding Cc some experts.

About the IPsec support, we are writing a document, it is in progress.


28/07/2024 14:51, Yaron Illouz:
> Hi
> 
> I am interested to do ipsec encoding and decoding in my dpdk application
> From my readings, i understand ipsec can be done one time in the nic (inline ipsec) or with multiple calls (rte_cryptodev_enqueue_burst, rte_cryptodev_dequeue_burst....)
> 
> 
>   1.  If ipsec is done by nic I only need to call rte_ipsec_pkt_process(...) without other functions?
> 
> I use  rte_eth_rx_burst to read from nic.
> 
>   1.  Where do I see list of nic that support nic inline ipsec? I believe not all dpdk nic support it.
>   2.  How much does it impact performance ? is there a table of performance per nic?
>   3.  My application is multi process, I can see in documentation :
> 
> “Currently, the security library does not support the case of multi-process. It will be updated in the future releases.” From https://doc.dpdk.org/guides/prog_guide/rte_security.html
> 
> So ipsec also is not supported for multi process application?
> 
> Even if done inline by the nic?
> 
> And what about non inline ipsec for multi process applications?
> 
> 
> 
>   1.  Is ip sec also supported in multi queue with rte flow in the inline ipsec ?
> 






  reply	other threads:[~2024-07-31 10:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-07-28 12:51 Yaron Illouz
2024-07-31 10:39 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2024-07-31 18:06   ` [EXTERNAL] " Akhil Goyal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3105959.ktpJ11cQ8Q@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=anoobj@marvell.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=gakhil@marvell.com \
    --cc=kai.ji@intel.com \
    --cc=konstantin.v.ananyev@yandex.ru \
    --cc=radu.nicolau@intel.com \
    --cc=users@dpdk.org \
    --cc=yaroni@radcom.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).