From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Arnon Warshavsky <arnon@qwilt.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, wenzhuo.lu@intel.com,
declan.doherty@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com,
bruce.richardson@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com,
ranjit.menon@intel.com, anand.rawat@intel.com,
Pallavi Kadam <pallavi.kadam@intel.com>,
Harini Ramakrishnan <harini.ramakrishnan@microsoft.com>,
"O'Hare, Cathal" <cathal.ohare@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/11] al: replace calls to rte_panic and refrain from new instances
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 16:50:48 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3131803.2ETXjPmY0d@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1524552123-31378-1-git-send-email-arnon@qwilt.com>
Hi,
24/04/2018 08:41, Arnon Warshavsky:
> The purpose of this patch series is to cleanup the library code
> from paths that end up aborting the process,
> and move to checking error values, in order to allow the running process
> perform an orderly teardown or other mitigation of the event.
>
> This patch modifies the majority of rte_panic calls
> under lib and drivers, and replaces them with a log message
> and an error return code according to context,
> that can be propagated up the call stack.
>
> - Focus was given to the dpdk initialization path
> - Some of the panic calls within drivers were left in place where
> the call is from within an interrupt or calls that are
> on the data path,where there is no simple applicative
> route to propagate the error to temination.
> These should be handled by the driver maintainers..
> - local void functions with no api were changed to retrun a value
> where needed
> - No change took place in example and test files
> - No change took place for debug assertions calling panic
> - A new function was added to devtools/checkpatches.sh
> in order to prevent new additions of calls to rte_panic
> under lib and drivers.
>
> Keep calm and don't panic
What happened to this patchset?
This is definitely an improvement. We must remove rte_panic from libs.
Arnon, are you still available to rebase this patchset in preparation
of 19.08? Or someone else?
What are the required API breakages? I see one in ethdev which requires
a deprecation notice to be sent for publishing in 19.05.
Is there more rte_panic to remove?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-18 14:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-04-24 6:41 Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 01/11] crypto/dpaa: replace rte_panic instances in crypto/dpaa driver Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 15:00 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-24 19:27 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 02/11] bond: replace rte_panic instances in bonding driver Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 03/11] e1000: replace rte_panic instances in e1000 driver Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 04/11] ixgbe: replace rte_panic instances in ixgbe driver Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 05/11] eal: replace rte_panic instances in eventdev Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 15:04 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-24 15:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2018-04-24 19:28 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 06/11] kni: replace rte_panic instances in kni Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:41 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 07/11] eal: replace rte_panic instances in hugepage_info Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 08/11] eal: replace rte_panic instances in interrupts thread Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 09/11] eal: replace rte_panic instances in ethdev Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 10/11] eal: replace rte_panic instances in init sequence Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:42 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 11/11] devtools: prevent new instances of rte_panic and rte_exit Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:44 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v6 00/11] al: replace calls to rte_panic and refrain from new instances Arnon Warshavsky
2018-04-24 6:57 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2019-04-18 14:50 ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2019-04-18 14:50 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-21 19:16 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2019-04-21 19:16 ` Arnon Warshavsky
2019-04-21 21:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-04-21 21:10 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-08 11:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-08 11:15 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-08 14:47 ` David Marchand
2019-05-08 14:47 ` David Marchand
2019-05-09 12:05 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-09 12:05 ` Burakov, Anatoly
2019-05-09 13:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-09 13:16 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-23 11:14 ` Thomas Monjalon
2019-05-23 13:13 ` Arnon Warshavsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3131803.2ETXjPmY0d@xps \
--to=thomas@monjalon.net \
--cc=anand.rawat@intel.com \
--cc=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
--cc=arnon@qwilt.com \
--cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
--cc=cathal.ohare@intel.com \
--cc=declan.doherty@intel.com \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
--cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
--cc=harini.ramakrishnan@microsoft.com \
--cc=jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com \
--cc=pallavi.kadam@intel.com \
--cc=ranjit.menon@intel.com \
--cc=wenzhuo.lu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).