From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f172.google.com (mail-wi0-f172.google.com
 [209.85.212.172]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56AA74A63
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun,  2 Aug 2015 23:27:48 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wicgj17 with SMTP id gj17so80495527wic.1
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Sun, 02 Aug 2015 14:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=okTKBU5mCpkk1xpDIbg2mbYIGqTicWWsadeAP1PNr4s=;
 b=RUe7ia+8+ak+T0vaoqIdf5V/6kz3cFwo3Mit3Gp8ExhYStwcXvBf45M5zSucJZPpY/
 1gxWoZijyn8Ag1gvr5fu7OF+BUKCF8de2duBWMOQg6zLkmQmHzONSOB63Et8Vc8Rv9sU
 M5Jzt+eJHt722WO1eEIV/Dm9Z7SVko2pzgCsYOVizTZVjxcIqWviVC2EaOFOQiDBxgqe
 PSmiJtr4BIMWFpOZgs8MGfoFLYZ4SRyXAiTE+hOYjildzboNnSiDZrd0Eh70E+XFCfTR
 BgXtCC4Jv0t32HD8SqX4UPl9M1lLnhtsrJlvlQdHwI06pF0BTFueafWhexBkpGD2O1Yy
 lEaw==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQmsoW5wGbsL1HS1OVU9WCG1muZrph7ZkntlEaAGMV3v+V1ff6WSTMMaYGuKn496GTPq1IFj
X-Received: by 10.194.178.99 with SMTP id cx3mr26593829wjc.33.1438550868259;
 Sun, 02 Aug 2015 14:27:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id fz16sm10075442wic.3.2015.08.02.14.27.46
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Sun, 02 Aug 2015 14:27:46 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: Yong Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 23:26:32 +0200
Message-ID: <3134557.VXyn7jiyUM@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <1438140121-9011-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com>
References: <1438140121-9011-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app test: fix mempool cache_size not match
	limited cache_size
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Aug 2015 21:27:48 -0000

2015-07-29 11:22, Yong Liu:
> In previous setting, mempool size and cache_size are both 32.
> This is not satisfied with cache_size checking rule by now.
> Cache size should less than CONFIG_RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE and mempool size / 1.5.

Sorry I don't really understand this explanation.

>  #define NB_MBUF          32
>  #define MBUF_DATA_SZ     (2048 + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)
> -#define PKT_BURST_SZ     32
> +#define PKT_BURST_SZ     0
>  #define MEMPOOL_CACHE_SZ PKT_BURST_SZ

Shouldn't be MEMPOOL_CACHE_SZ to set to 0?