From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com (mail-wi0-f177.google.com
 [209.85.212.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32491C3B4
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon,  3 Aug 2015 23:46:54 +0200 (CEST)
Received: by wibxm9 with SMTP id xm9so139857091wib.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=fDgCSjRU7m/EJu/tEq2xFxBG+YVGNxEhO0wgK6wRG7E=;
 b=Vn5dOIMJkhE2VCmROtMIle6ouv2IuUgS6imlum3430v3FWSsEZze8GqTisRlh5uTw8
 Dr9+pxG61k5eTHU3KsX+UTHH0e+A0DGy/hv9s2sCT5T4WEfwAXgCouOHAzxdlzh8uqiF
 Tp5Fakbu+mhuRLmYR5rqpgQ7KVDx6BeAvqp0EGV2i6Ze+VWj7ftg4eQ8iSBLoeObYsYW
 kRA1A3mmp04Kly/W+Ry10iLBvPj2CiWayjleFcEfGRRPMm1j+16tLTuxPdoea3mbl8xW
 ysMUPch9YaRd1TGI4rOB+vrTxg2gQlXG6JqErsGkDjamCJ449GfesY5g/0jxmHHuW0JC
 0rSA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn8jtG6GGZ5qvvp9rDoZ3d3aSN6gTDmdH/dWbhdj3A4epOa4mTvDSE5hik7M5NlMLVpD2Ho
X-Received: by 10.194.216.68 with SMTP id oo4mr344052wjc.81.1438638414072;
 Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:46:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (136-92-190-109.dsl.ovh.fr. [109.190.92.136])
 by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id uc3sm15539195wib.2.2015.08.03.14.46.52
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Mon, 03 Aug 2015 14:46:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: "Liu, Yong" <yong.liu@intel.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 23:45:38 +0200
Message-ID: <3134746.zTmlkJngrL@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.14.8 (Linux/4.0.4-2-ARCH; KDE/4.14.8; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8C92AA1@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
References: <1438140121-9011-1-git-send-email-yong.liu@intel.com>
 <9BB6961774997848B5B42BEC655768F8C92AA1@SHSMSX104.ccr.corp.intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Cc: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] app test: fix mempool cache_size not
	match	limited cache_size
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2015 21:46:54 -0000

> > From: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> > 
> > In previous setting, mempool size and cache_size are both 32.
> > This is not satisfied with cache_size checking rule by now.
> > Cache size should less than CONFIG_RTE_MEMPOOL_CACHE_MAX_SIZE and
> > mempool size / 1.5.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Marvin Liu <yong.liu@intel.com>
> > 
> Acked-by: Jingjing Wu <jingjing.wu@intel.com>

> >  #define NB_MBUF          32
> >  #define MBUF_DATA_SZ     (2048 + RTE_PKTMBUF_HEADROOM)
> > -#define PKT_BURST_SZ     32
> > +#define PKT_BURST_SZ     0
> >  #define MEMPOOL_CACHE_SZ PKT_BURST_SZ
> >  #define SOCKET           0

Applied after removing PKT_BURST_SZ, thanks