From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4C55137C
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:02:44 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B64520AFE;
 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:02:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:02:44 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=O2i/30ycWvL+BDj
 yVKIJk1W4/2LFHtOlheqmqSa5Xlw=; b=h8UnDibCH7WDfyRe7Wc+NP+dqAnkN7c
 9fO0BJCPOImvCUwJ8et77G+FltNrDy9tqO1Dlo5UkueNZLK8qIEYmqZAV+v8FIIy
 Ev3ZCLfd/JvaqafJ6pFvlzyQb+byiTO7+2YQMjp///rGZIJXQHWDT60blY+F2e3A
 tIoo1xf1m2QI=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=
 fm1; bh=O2i/30ycWvL+BDjyVKIJk1W4/2LFHtOlheqmqSa5Xlw=; b=pIQZzmPu
 HWPn/yH37oP7Q3X6qlSzXVHg0X3GhlruR8UhAh/YxmEL8I9pZTF2gFribFP5RDb0
 az2R2GvZTqxJIsB2qK8qxcqp+ZLBGLsfAO+z39DUc9jrwlHZIAzAHE9EMY/4OnUD
 zGB8PY1esggG670v3EjV8X/pd5k0nXxG+lkDGwIJCuEjH2IOnHAPcA6SzDqwp5GW
 4J202lGxVHx0WyGBWjNeGg+k7+rOF9a3hR8/8MN5RucKLSEwEUt2R98Khs3rzR4Q
 mcwQ0NH2RcAWRK1kUon3rKmrPepaRY5+mLe9DXY1Xzas1Bq1EWkGKpdDePU5tlio
 4j9eb4cUdrM2Jw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:FIKlWT4zgZnvkirE0CdD-xu8fKmidiJ48mxiFharXDKzi81M2KeXsQ>
X-Sasl-enc: 0ClYjj6ynIR5Xf0So7WPd/FWWVaE7y54S/OHLuzIDq2X 1504018963
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id D91F67E77A;
 Tue, 29 Aug 2017 11:02:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Jerin Jacob <jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>, "Carrillo,
 Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, "Richardson, Bruce" <bruce.richardson@intel.com>, "Van Haaren,
 Harry" <harry.van.haaren@intel.com>,
 "hemant.agrawal@nxp.com" <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>, "Eads,
 Gage" <gage.eads@intel.com>, "nipun.gupta@nxp.com" <nipun.gupta@nxp.com>,
 "Vangati, Narender" <narender.vangati@intel.com>, "Rao,
 Nikhil" <nikhil.rao@intel.com>,
 "pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com" <pbhagavatula@caviumnetworks.com>,
 "jianbo.liu@linaro.org" <jianbo.liu@linaro.org>,
 "rsanford@akamai.com" <rsanford@akamai.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 17:02:43 +0200
Message-ID: <31351930.ptpEdNRZ9E@xps>
In-Reply-To: <20170825102537.GC9774@jerin>
References: <20170817161104.24293-1-jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com>
 <BE54F058557D9A4FAC1D84E2FC6D87570D52F57E@fmsmsx115.amr.corp.intel.com>
 <20170825102537.GC9774@jerin>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH 0/1] eventtimer: introduce event timer
	wheel
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 29 Aug 2017 15:02:44 -0000

25/08/2017 12:25, Jerin Jacob:
> From: "Carrillo, Erik G" <erik.g.carrillo@intel.com>
[...]
> > In summary, it looks like our solutions align fairly well, and I propose that we take on the software implementation if there are no objections.
> 
> Sure, no objection.

Good to see such a basic function generalized for NPU and CPU.

Are you going to use rte_timer for CPU implementation?
Does it mean that event_timer supersedes rte_timer?