DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Burakov, Anatoly" <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
To: Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>
Cc: <dev@dpdk.org>, Ian Stokes <ian.stokes@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 04/13] net/i40e: use the common Rx queue structure
Date: Thu, 15 May 2025 13:09:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <313f5667-0627-4436-815f-bf95d9ffbe87@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aCTKVAL2nSNU4rRP@bricha3-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>

On 5/14/2025 6:52 PM, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Mon, May 12, 2025 at 01:54:30PM +0100, Anatoly Burakov wrote:
>> Make the i40e driver use the new common Rx queue structure.
>>
>> Because the i40e driver supports both 16-byte and 32-byte descriptor
>> formats (controlled by RTE_LIBRTE_I40E_16BYTE_RX_DESC define), the common
>> queue structure has to take that into account, so the ring queue structure
>> will have both, while the actual descriptor format is picked by i40e at
>> compile time using the above macro. Direct usage of Rx queue structure is
>> now meant to be replaced with a macro access that takes descriptor size
>> into account.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Anatoly Burakov <anatoly.burakov@intel.com>
>> ---
>>   drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h                 |  14 ++
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.c          |   4 +-
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_ethdev.h          |   4 +-
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_fdir.c            |  16 +--
>>   .../i40e/i40e_recycle_mbufs_vec_common.c      |   6 +-
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx.c            | 126 +++++++++---------
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx.h            |  74 +++-------
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_common_avx.h |   6 +-
>>   .../net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_altivec.c    |  22 +--
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_avx2.c   |  12 +-
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_avx512.c |  12 +-
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_common.h |   4 +-
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_neon.c   |  24 ++--
>>   drivers/net/intel/i40e/i40e_rxtx_vec_sse.c    |  24 ++--
>>   14 files changed, 160 insertions(+), 188 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h b/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
>> index 524de39f9c..db49db57d0 100644
>> --- a/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
>> +++ b/drivers/net/intel/common/rx.h
>> @@ -30,6 +30,8 @@ struct ci_rx_queue {
>>   	struct rte_mempool  *mp; /**< mbuf pool to populate RX ring. */
>>   	union { /* RX ring virtual address */
>>   		volatile union ixgbe_adv_rx_desc *ixgbe_rx_ring;
>> +		volatile union i40e_16byte_rx_desc *i40e_rx_16b_ring;
>> +		volatile union i40e_32byte_rx_desc *i40e_rx_32b_ring;
> 
> Rather than doing this, would it not be better to keep using the current
> scheme of just having an #ifdef aliasing i40e_rx_desc to either the 16byte
> or 32byte variants?
> 
> /Bruce

I had that in my first iteration, but I don't really like having 
driver-specific #ifdefs in a common header. Plus, it also introduces 
header ordering dependencies (need to include header with definitions 
before including this one), so I decided against it.

-- 
Thanks,
Anatoly

  reply	other threads:[~2025-05-15 11:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-05-06 13:27 [PATCH v1 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:27 ` [PATCH v1 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-06 13:28 ` [PATCH v1 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58 ` [PATCH v2 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 10:58   ` [PATCH v2 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54 ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 02/13] net/iavf: make IPsec stats dynamically allocated Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:39     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 03/13] net/ixgbe: create common Rx queue structure Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:45     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 04/13] net/i40e: use the " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:52     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:09       ` Burakov, Anatoly [this message]
2025-05-15 12:55         ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 05/13] net/ice: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-14 16:56     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 06/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:59     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:11       ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:57         ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 07/13] net/intel: generalize vectorized Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:56     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 08/13] net/i40e: use common Rx rearm code Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 10:58     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 09/13] net/iavf: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 10/13] net/ixgbe: " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 11/13] net/intel: support wider x86 vectors for Rx rearm Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 12/13] net/intel: add common Rx mbuf recycle Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-12 12:54   ` [PATCH v3 13/13] net/intel: add common Tx " Anatoly Burakov
2025-05-15 11:07     ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-12 12:58   ` [PATCH v3 01/13] net/ixgbe: remove unused field in Rx queue struct Bruce Richardson
2025-05-14 16:32   ` Bruce Richardson
2025-05-15 11:15     ` Burakov, Anatoly
2025-05-15 12:58       ` Bruce Richardson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=313f5667-0627-4436-815f-bf95d9ffbe87@intel.com \
    --to=anatoly.burakov@intel.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ian.stokes@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).