From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1220CA0093; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:42:19 +0100 (CET) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BECEE42727; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:42:18 +0100 (CET) Received: from wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout1-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.24]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5193F40150 for ; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:42:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16FB13201E78; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 06:42:16 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 13 Jan 2022 06:42:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm3; bh= lT66B0u7UMARGO20pz/j+7aaks3RH6rk2W7Tot6AA8I=; b=L1DYUKfYj0x8evbU fS3e8mSnkbfal+BD7dsH+1FzIzR+yta0kftL/PkTNI4ged106HHof1//iCOqOgpo H0SC+eP3DSObU4fPRFjnvCXrEuXX8sFRXMc97JaFUDNzEUAjz5OikHSs7Zn3BotL VHYqnul4YFyJNdBExelbysUbl73EIEVaULU4XMRhGAQlXoVy7mdx4eDaHXRq2/q2 DEfzMU17jtndJbXXv8PD5jV2HZin38ChqlU+iY5GndaLS+CoDA2mONvmBHzYI0K7 kNVeQUChUd+59Z171vEFxx602jhBGir2Ied8R9If8xn5N9swxjkkh/3GdD8YNU7C JLYOXw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=lT66B0u7UMARGO20pz/j+7aaks3RH6rk2W7Tot6AA 8I=; b=dsrdrFLWaIm+yM+64pgRydlJTcSH/aDKL84yyxB3eYN0HGM1Qxs+ncgfM hcO/6jDbETAmVa0neLJzTp/qp4Q7T3V1Px+q6maI/8pyz0BJRVojU9PAkzhr3JWr eoavLOsdQziftJfR2M/ikqX+kb0PQOX9uXzFqQvCtNYLwHclnxXKz/w3pONQbiOv pe43nRM59n2ovceQlqML5gmIBSKyfks9v+254jhkYXTMW6fN67Tv+FMUEcxi/I56 TJ5TYajwMdKaM7OER3i9+lzOe1543DUOAelw65toQ/rQ2zEfDeGU7vKLEEEqbCgy B89JbA5sfA+qBJlyK4kPIF9MMoOmA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvvddrtdefgdeftdcutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpeduudelhfdujeevteetkeeugfeggeeigfehueeugfegiedtvdehleeu ueeivdelvdenucffohhmrghinheptghonhhfihhgrdhmihhnihenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Thu, 13 Jan 2022 06:42:15 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Josh Soref Cc: dev@dpdk.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] ci: restrict concurrency Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2022 12:42:13 +0100 Message-ID: <3172041.VqM8IeB0Os@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20220112065019.58924-2-jsoref@gmail.com> References: <20220112065019.58924-1-jsoref@gmail.com> <20220112065019.58924-2-jsoref@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Hi, The explanation should be in the patch, not the cover letter. Actually, you don't need a cover letter for a single patch. Copying it here: " dpdk is fairly expensive to build in GitHub. It's helpful to abandon old builds as soon as there's a new build waiting instead of wasting resources on the previous round. " 12/01/2022 07:50, Josh Soref: > Signed-off-by: Josh Soref > --- > + concurrency: > + group: build-${{ matrix.config.os }}-${{ matrix.config.compiler }}-${{ matrix.config.library }}-${{ matrix.config.cross }}-${{ matrix.config.mini }}-${{ github.event.pull_request.number || github.ref }} > + cancel-in-progress: true The goal of the CI is to catch any issue in a submitted patch. Is your change cancelling a test of a patch when another one is submitted?