From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas@monjalon.net>
Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2443B2B92
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:36:52 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FA5221EAB;
 Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:36:51 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:36:51 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to
 :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender
 :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=ZWMslUBJ/DlG3YRNNukRfamv1f
 AVrzRwLXSQ/UoHckA=; b=O0ry8y1R2TtRyvj5HSIkMGkhzEjJcebaJWcdpO8wFl
 Jj5yilhfGBxc7APFg+j68F6Z0pjhNMLGt2eKck5y85aoutYpNa/iUoeA+JxKkZzu
 p9RXF/DApHWDSSoBgVcYis4h16Z3k4+eTbk++kaSx8roSXTuLfynqkCEfKZlL5l3
 c=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=ZWMslU
 BJ/DlG3YRNNukRfamv1fAVrzRwLXSQ/UoHckA=; b=J2CGhM6HoI2OSw7ZyKW9Fp
 1KxzYeGQdRIQoJQarH+lYmsfI0nxvyID6gEXomgY48bVQJrNFw/rSLF9xzOpShFN
 RbveMx0OhWGNGDJTQ1ppJMsgiGmKRHBO/MFpucV67AZd+dmBD9XMNMDW1/hoUDQI
 jUPMQDZPIcNSN6rdfSy/mw1QeIoJ3/3EKu51xwxa8eW9byL/zTjpwQhn25DsN2Ad
 aJ9PXLVIlzQT69vXuEFstEl8YYX4Cvm9Tx5i1HgNCfkE1BNnX2h6sRG5z/A+wSIW
 TTqabaD402c7G5VVX3HwQ4BH9yqy/ZpPUhadfKhf3ij4fypqvy+WjIWUdkNkV0ig
 ==
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:oqyHW-KzyPGfCqVonbCvCFBxdk6-o69XkmDnkrWwezETA6CinBL7YQ>
 <xmx:oqyHWwHpoLW-J4CSuJAdumX3wrRGvkQB_7pqOQEb_2Veu_Z8-VVxyw>
 <xmx:oqyHWwklpakD9ogPLKfk7voL4vUNwg7X-VsSYBraBlAUhSt0PvK50A>
 <xmx:oqyHW-1Z6mJOd4xi9r6ZpOCl8qR3NJgH4fhnh7_uDwbr14VFtYFdHw>
 <xmx:oqyHW-wXa8D5PBpCBgUs51KBSEv27n0GEJR08GOEyS9gJrQZFv6qEA>
 <xmx:o6yHWzx6VupHYb8ErKbzq5gfEHNefKpfSAUJ-LC77HpUalW1D7Jjww>
X-ME-Sender: <xms:oayHW6iQ3E0fnE7bDaBscY7DIgPyKjvezIAa3JYl4MD21gIIO896aQ>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A836410299;
 Thu, 30 Aug 2018 04:36:48 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Christian Ehrhardt <christian.ehrhardt@canonical.com>,
 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 Chao Zhu <chaozhu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, pradeep@us.ibm.com,
 Alfredo Mendoza <mendoza1@us.ibm.com>,
 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@in.ibm.com>,
 Gowrishankar Muthukrishnan <gowrishankar.m@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
 Kevin Reilly <kjreilly@us.ibm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, adrien.mazarguil@6wind.com, Luca Boccassi <bluca@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 10:36:46 +0200
Message-ID: <3195236.p3PdHVbfnl@xps>
In-Reply-To: <CAATJJ0Jn9PTu8QpdMZ6t5j-ThKH_fn-Ucy24oLutG=fKfUdXcQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAATJJ0Ld_3o7FzZaoRO_eK2qWDpBuYg6QtKDCVjEUh22V_7k=w@mail.gmail.com>
 <20180829131605.GJ3695@6wind.com>
 <CAATJJ0Jn9PTu8QpdMZ6t5j-ThKH_fn-Ucy24oLutG=fKfUdXcQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] 18.08 build error on ppc64el - bool as vector type
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2018 08:36:52 -0000

29/08/2018 16:37, Christian Ehrhardt:
> Why is no-one of IBM/Power world replying at all?
> There not even was a "oh yeah, <whatever the content would be>" mail by
> them.
> Is in fact ppc64 support in DPDK dead or at least "unmaintained"?
> This is something that mid term has to be sorted out - I tried to pull some
> strings to get attention "there" but so far I'm waiting for a reply.
> I'd say 18.11 should not be released with a clear re-confirmation of ppc64
> maintainance ppc64 by "someone".

I tend to agree.

Let's try again:

Chao, are you still available for DPDK PPC maintenance?

SHOULD WE DECLARE DPDK NOT SUPPORTED ON PPC64?