From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2BDC7A0C4E; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:55:23 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B9EB340E3C; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:55:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD38040E32 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:55:20 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 49F825C0197; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:55:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:55:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= eClDcnMl4D0oGKaREMDoTnjEnUkVXujAKi0TgFo5pnw=; b=UqP7da8wEgIWJxGW zbZIVise7i521X20fM5Nn24xZ6hQSAZsjj2Jn2tcTwvSblPfIhqeVWn86yjmagu5 hoLFtTSEbn98VlSvp97dvc9SMg044/rAkqFAMfFbwgvBCEy65ObwKiSO7OWBf8XM ekiUb+Q/vCQ5aPgB2S6q3Lm7AQXRPIkXIzF8gHJFAx6kAGph16hH7cAvU4h4FbPz EaTaF8SK9ZntA01KIjvyQwaJb4qSuejkiwSST4HEh4Y2IVvbDD0EKhBLsA2BKhYk xvPgPNRMqP5NVQsa1DMXGZ2JJE/pEXL34KugX5mir4AJNpbmfCLZhW+pc/pfbR8C djksgw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=eClDcnMl4D0oGKaREMDoTnjEnUkVXujAKi0TgFo5p nw=; b=KybbDBZFQIL+VAtWxCxcaqvSLmmAb4Edh4D/KpI0Fky4allGrJN+3lO14 0yO7X6nfM/JicnjJ/k2ObJ39sEHhsFoPFqNSH2CRxaaz/D68+fBmzGbq/YG6ODWG wIdL77Q0Hz5WDZ9VmNq8Jl1JCKXjFc2oIi6s/yaZnboI9cLWAm8RyQ3s32IZ5mEX ySN6WQ77CjCYGMnJH4oL2pnQLuaDMGYH/3h2qegrElL406tQIbFj/1EVdDSWxKvU RYMr7l7JNqMB3Q++fUclVEX0exwKEx92XmJpkczFq1LRxCvhOUhZXs1l+Y4gBIbG u5jCycHzdDB4juUtvlMagION66kmA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrvdefhedgkeekucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 25 Oct 2021 11:55:18 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Kefu Chai Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Avi Kivity , anatoly.burakov@intel.com, Bruce Richardson Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2021 17:55:17 +0200 Message-ID: <3195786.qzLq50EVuH@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210902144805.105098-1-tchaikov@gmail.com> <20211013205417.84119-2-tchaikov@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 1/2] build: add meson options of atomic_mbuf_ref_counts X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 14/10/2021 10:20, Bruce Richardson: > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 04:54:18AM +0800, Kefu Chai wrote: > > RTE_MBUF_REFCNT_ATOMIC = 0 is not necessary for applications like > > Seastar, where it's safe to assume that the mbuf refcnt is only > > updated by a single core only. > > > > Signed-off-by: Kefu Chai > > --- > > For this, I think it's a setting that needs to be a global one for DPDK, so > I'm ok with adding it as a meson option. > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson Changed the option name to "mbuf_refcnt_atomic" to match the flag. Applied, thanks.