From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37B27A0C4A; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:20:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB43840696; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:20:38 +0200 (CEST) Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4EA9D4014F for ; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:20:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.53]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4GLFfS3qptzbbYS; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 20:17:20 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.103.128] (10.67.103.128) by dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2176.2; Thu, 8 Jul 2021 20:20:33 +0800 To: Andrew Rybchenko , Xiaoyun Li , Anatoly Burakov CC: , Lijun Ou , Ajit Khaparde , Ferruh Yigit References: <1615430867-29992-1-git-send-email-humin29@huawei.com> <20210702120906.705007-1-Andrew.Rybchenko@oktetlabs.ru> From: "Min Hu (Connor)" Message-ID: <3213dc8b-f40a-cfbe-aa69-7f8925773bfe@huawei.com> Date: Thu, 8 Jul 2021 20:20:32 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.3.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Originating-IP: [10.67.103.128] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems706-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.183) To dggeme756-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.102) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v15] app/testpmd: support multi-process X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" Hi, Andrew , 在 2021/7/2 20:47, Andrew Rybchenko 写道: > On 7/2/21 3:09 PM, Andrew Rybchenko wrote: >> From: "Min Hu (Connor)" >> >> For example the following commands run two testpmd processes: >> >> * the primary process: >> >> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i \ >> --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0 >> >> * the secondary process: >> >> ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i \ >> --rxq=4 --txq=4 --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1 >> >> Signed-off-by: Min Hu (Connor) >> Signed-off-by: Lijun Ou >> Signed-off-by: Andrew Rybchenko >> Acked-by: Xiaoyun Li >> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde >> Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit > > [snip] > >> diff --git a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c >> index 1cdd3cdd1..a5da0c272 100644 >> --- a/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c >> +++ b/app/test-pmd/testpmd.c >> @@ -520,6 +520,62 @@ enum rte_eth_rx_mq_mode rx_mq_mode = ETH_MQ_RX_VMDQ_DCB_RSS; >> */ >> uint32_t eth_link_speed; >> >> +/* >> + * ID of the current process in multi-process, used to >> + * configure the queues to be polled. >> + */ >> +int proc_id; >> + >> +/* >> + * Number of processes in multi-process, used to >> + * configure the queues to be polled. >> + */ >> +unsigned int num_procs = 1; >> + >> +static int >> +eth_dev_configure_mp(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t nb_rx_q, uint16_t nb_tx_q, >> + const struct rte_eth_conf *dev_conf) >> +{ >> + if (is_proc_primary()) >> + return rte_eth_dev_configure(port_id, nb_rx_q, nb_tx_q, >> + dev_conf); >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int >> +eth_dev_start_mp(uint16_t port_id) >> +{ >> + if (is_proc_primary()) >> + return rte_eth_dev_start(port_id); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static int >> +eth_dev_stop_mp(uint16_t port_id) >> +{ >> + if (is_proc_primary()) >> + return rte_eth_dev_stop(port_id); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + >> +static void >> +mempool_free_mp(struct rte_mempool *mp) >> +{ >> + if (is_proc_primary()) >> + rte_mempool_free(mp); >> +} >> + >> +static int >> +eth_dev_set_mtu_mp(uint16_t port_id, uint16_t mtu) >> +{ >> + if (is_proc_primary()) >> + return rte_eth_dev_set_mtu(port_id, mtu); >> + >> + return 0; >> +} >> + > > I think above functions should be removed and corresponding > checks should be done in caller directly since above functions > are used in single place only and just hide what actually > happens in the case of secondary process. It is very > misleading. > This was done as Ferruh suggested in V9， and this could reduce the complexity for testpmd when added by the multi-process support. > [snip] > >> @@ -2495,21 +2565,24 @@ start_port(portid_t pid) >> return -1; >> } >> /* configure port */ >> - diag = rte_eth_dev_configure(pi, nb_rxq + nb_hairpinq, >> - nb_txq + nb_hairpinq, >> - &(port->dev_conf)); >> + diag = eth_dev_configure_mp(pi, >> + nb_rxq + nb_hairpinq, >> + nb_txq + nb_hairpinq, >> + &(port->dev_conf)); >> if (diag != 0) { >> - if (rte_atomic16_cmpset(&(port->port_status), >> - RTE_PORT_HANDLING, RTE_PORT_STOPPED) == 0) >> - printf("Port %d can not be set back " >> - "to stopped\n", pi); >> + if (rte_atomic16_cmpset( >> + &(port->port_status), >> + RTE_PORT_HANDLING, >> + RTE_PORT_STOPPED) == 0) >> + printf("Port %d cannot be set back to stopped\n", >> + pi); > > Unrelated changes in the patch should be avoided since > it just makes the review harder.This will be fixed in v16. > >> printf("Fail to configure port %d\n", pi); >> /* try to reconfigure port next time */ >> port->need_reconfig = 1; >> return -1; >> } >> } >> - if (port->need_reconfig_queues > 0) { >> + if (port->need_reconfig_queues > 0 && is_proc_primary()) { >> port->need_reconfig_queues = 0; >> /* setup tx queues */ >> for (qi = 0; qi < nb_txq; qi++) { >> @@ -2532,8 +2605,8 @@ start_port(portid_t pid) >> if (rte_atomic16_cmpset(&(port->port_status), >> RTE_PORT_HANDLING, >> RTE_PORT_STOPPED) == 0) >> - printf("Port %d can not be set back " >> - "to stopped\n", pi); >> + printf("Port %d cannot be set back to stopped\n", >> + pi); > > Unrelated changes in the patch should be avoided. This will be fixed in v16. > >> printf("Fail to configure port %d tx queues\n", >> pi); >> /* try to reconfigure queues next time */ >> @@ -2610,16 +2683,16 @@ start_port(portid_t pid) >> cnt_pi++; >> >> /* start port */ >> - diag = rte_eth_dev_start(pi); >> + diag = eth_dev_start_mp(pi); >> if (diag < 0) { >> printf("Fail to start port %d: %s\n", pi, >> rte_strerror(-diag)); >> >> /* Fail to setup rx queue, return */ >> if (rte_atomic16_cmpset(&(port->port_status), >> - RTE_PORT_HANDLING, RTE_PORT_STOPPED) == 0) >> - printf("Port %d can not be set back to " >> - "stopped\n", pi); >> + RTE_PORT_HANDLING, RTE_PORT_STOPPED) == 0) >> + printf("Port %d cannot be set back to stopped\n", >> + pi); > > Unrelated changes in the patch should be avoided. This will be fixed in v16. > > [snip] > >> diff --git a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst >> index eb4831835..348e5fcac 100644 >> --- a/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst >> +++ b/doc/guides/testpmd_app_ug/run_app.rst >> @@ -545,3 +545,85 @@ The command line options are: >> bit 0 - two hairpin ports loop >> >> The default value is 0. Hairpin will use single port mode and implicit Tx flow mode. >> + >> + >> +Testpmd Multi-Process Command-line Options >> +~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> + >> +The following are the command-line options for testpmd multi-process support: >> + >> +* primary process: >> + >> +.. code-block:: console >> + >> + sudo ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 0-1 -- -i --rxq=4 --txq=4 \ >> + --num-procs=2 --proc-id=0 >> + >> +* secondary process: >> + >> +.. code-block:: console >> + >> + sudo ./dpdk-testpmd --proc-type=auto -l 2-3 -- -i --rxq=4 --txq=4 \ >> + --num-procs=2 --proc-id=1 >> + >> +The command line options are: >> + >> +* ``--num-procs=N`` >> + >> + The number of processes which will be used. >> + >> +* ``--proc-id=ID`` >> + >> + The ID of the current process (ID < num-procs). ID should be different in >> + primary process and secondary process, which starts from '0'. >> + >> +Calculation rule for queue: >> +All queues are allocated to different processes based on ``proc_num`` and >> +``proc_id``. >> +Calculation rule for the testpmd to allocate queues to each process: >> + >> +* start(queue start id) = proc_id * nb_q / num_procs >> + >> +* end(queue end id) = start + nb_q / num_procs >> + >> +For example, if testpmd is configured to have 4 Tx and Rx queues, >> +queues 0 and 1 will be used by the primary process and >> +queues 2 and 3 will be used by the secondary process. >> + >> +The number of queues should be a multiple of the number of processes. If not, >> +redundant queues will exist after queues are allocated to processes. If RSS >> +is enabled, packet loss occurs when traffic is sent to all processes at the same >> +time. Some traffic goes to redundant queues and cannot be forwarded. >> + >> +All the dev ops is supported in primary process. While secondary process is >> +not permitted to allocate or release shared memory, so some ops are not supported >> +as follows: >> + >> +- ``dev_configure`` >> +- ``dev_start`` >> +- ``dev_stop`` >> +- ``rx_queue_setup`` >> +- ``tx_queue_setup`` >> +- ``rx_queue_release`` >> +- ``tx_queue_release`` >> + >> +So, any command from testpmd which calls those APIs will not be supported in >> +secondary process, like: >> + >> +.. code-block:: console >> + >> + port config all rxq|txq|rxd|txd >> + port config rx_offload xxx on/off >> + port config tx_offload xxx on/off >> + >> +etc. > > I did the formatting cleanup, but I still think that testpmd > guide should not dive into such level of details. It should > rather highlight multi-process behaviour specifics. > > Shouldn't testpmd store state in shared memory to avoid > problems when primary is stopped while secondary is running This could be taken into consideration in future. > > Some testpmd features rely on reconfigure (i.e. simply change > configuration and set flag that reconfigure is required), but > configure does nothing and will simply ignore new settings. > So, it could look very-very confusing from user point of view. > > I'm not sure that it is acceptable to apply the patch in such > state and open huge number of bugs in testpmd behaviour when > multi-process is used. > > I'd even consider to exclude unsupported commands from help > etc. However, such level of care about user could be excessive > for test tool. This has been done in doc. > > IMHO, it should be no requirement to repeat the primary > process command-line configuration in the second process > command line (see --rxq=4 --txq=4 above). The information > should be obtained from shared state. In theory primary > process could even change some settings in interactive We think keeping the command line in consistent between primary and secondary is easy to understand for users. While shared memory for keeping in order or communicating could be performed,but this could be done in future patch. > mode. I think testpmd should guarantee consistent behaviour > even in such conditions. I.e. do not allow to stop ports > used by forwarding running in secondary processes. > Run-time queues setup and deferred start should be very > carefully handled as well. ``dev_stop`` is not allowed in secondary, which has described in doc. >> + >> +Stats is supported, stats will not change when one quits and starts, as they >> +share the same buffer to store the stats. Flow rules are maintained in process >> +level: primary and secondary has its own flow list (but one flow list in HW). >> +The two can see all the queues, so setting the flow rules for the other is OK. >> +But in the testpmd primary process receiving or transmitting packets from the >> +queue allocated for secondary process is not permitted, and same for secondary >> +process. >> + >> +Flow API and RSS are supported. >>Thanks for your comment, This patch supports basic function for multi-process support in testpmd. I think other patches in future could enhance or optimize it, thanks. > > . >