From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97315A04FD; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:36:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68B801C20C; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:36:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5146F1C201 for ; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:36:13 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC04C21402; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 05:36:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 14 Jan 2020 05:36:12 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=FAACevdZZXwJdpMzn8WxsH7cyJ0DK2V3N1/5Ij7dmIQ=; b=dNvFuw6gB5Re pkbYOvF0G7DC9tr/Yt/64FUTOlmCquOYGDVKyG5gtlSSDol7V6cIP4oUTwrVPUed X7RnH6aaWmxaThjiFlATasdauRJ9tyOV/8mdYyr0/Anjkz+hqFLLqcKONNPb0hzt uCr9Z9nlp3dNHp5ChNlXjYj+esdma/8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=FAACevdZZXwJdpMzn8WxsH7cyJ0DK2V3N1/5Ij7dm IQ=; b=DArGoZwitte63YXg/o6FYeo+UhDwCO4NlnQDrIMzaxr48tc2BllvPP54b rttdFD7vsuRg/o8ADb4fuaQmjKYaO/1RFxsgoj0bDJNmvRrEf7cl+jQuhQ1r3omA E91oDlaT5+qfKp5a0MUQvQn/lnAhmWPFhqsIZXNakeP8q58fAqXwdEwg/YA6gPgP 9FieMFuSBz2Yhk9Aa6KKud3PVPeE6x6uFVrrqR4VrMkM09ZjJeBcP3FRCNOTdSgk 13mTRpqYB7dCtNTxmdK9fBvbrXP1FmH2JcpWOUFNvI2n4Vgat9y3eR9PM0NGPoYT 0mA9+1EDxuqtrgJKdh64Ur3JKb6tg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrtddtucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrh hofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghi lhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurh ephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgrshcuofho nhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecukfhppeejje drudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghs sehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedu X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4375930602DE; Tue, 14 Jan 2020 05:36:11 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand , Cristian Dumitrescu , "Yigit, Ferruh" Cc: dev , "Singh, Jasvinder" Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:36:10 +0100 Message-ID: <3216938.qSoW2BAyJ8@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20200114100559.19794-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <1926662.K71DO8KEF6@xps> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] maintainers: set git tree for packet framework and QoS X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 14/01/2020 11:27, David Marchand: > On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > 14/01/2020 11:05, David Marchand: > > About ethdev TM and MTR, I am not sure what is the right thing to do. > > The drivers using those apis are in dpdk-next-net. Yes this is my question: Is it fine merging QoS related patches on ethdev, drivers and testpmd in dpdk-next-net, or do we want them to be managed separately in dpdk-next-qos? There is not much activity here, so I am just anticipating a heavier activity.