From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wj0-f177.google.com (mail-wj0-f177.google.com [209.85.210.177]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D5B072C35 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 23:33:37 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wj0-f177.google.com with SMTP id v7so290614376wjy.2 for ; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 14:33:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XBIQ9uKDaScRH+WxuK45vH/ErljKATHHJK6vd8mAAUM=; b=vrPgn54a/UX2zJ8VhbFUJfqduo4aVXLQr4toFGQtv+LXjoMhQHD07M5IW50KES6sOH KX3jk1DIJgd6wFyFlN8U+ZvgqQX98AecFaAHqVbBu7wASvxRHqtzcVr8i1lB/ptR5CYW IzbWOiTrbRBq3DFYIsGzp0B2VNcgvXJZarhLlr/8YFNmm1K2794Zqn8Q3fvEK+oKBiHe iR3nau/bjCv0zuW8qly64opCJUCnMNcPV9kx+M5yrQLl79h+79DqAGJL0W6a5Plo0RO9 ONVC1nNwAWE2qpGkq1YiFwAqQSwYNu5jEvW4cvz1eLAoq+5NSCDl5kKayuUEH5DLYV2F DGLw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XBIQ9uKDaScRH+WxuK45vH/ErljKATHHJK6vd8mAAUM=; b=FY38V/EudTb2yKhm+R0EOohYr1gmYJrq0SZ2YqkZckBIn4ywi0crtu8O4m1yJmOU/A oHa2RBukG0DXWvf6JakYdBsUG4Uphtmcc8Yl+AzY+qxp++yGAPXflF8v5mr8OFlm0Zkn znCUQcVjbfklk7Sg+rNCTDc0t8sAaJ6IOrRnaHkPvjc1r5dpwY5fUEzF9baYEGJQ+y0d JokKNBW6+SvuYX+efRSQni/MQ8wcCbzAchhrRqX3l2kmJL8LRLYK2A0OLcn8IOyfaapw EU8eyg/m6fmdM752p5x1XE33zgNvcbugnu6dnSu4afuDGF5ryexf0gaG1C63+/WcHGCp r+GA== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXIli/GkeEENOqtmIgPHapQ65xcjpI//c3j80WT0w/lHHrfggy1K11y70neVf+rqsmt2 X-Received: by 10.194.222.169 with SMTP id qn9mr21017336wjc.62.1482705217545; Sun, 25 Dec 2016 14:33:37 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (APoitiers-656-1-641-242.w90-45.abo.wanadoo.fr. [90.45.162.242]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d184sm48960924wmd.8.2016.12.25.14.33.36 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sun, 25 Dec 2016 14:33:36 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Jan Blunck Cc: dev@dpdk.org, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com, david.marchand@6wind.com, stephen@networkplumber.org Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 23:33:35 +0100 Message-ID: <3218207.eTF77IRQHx@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1482508691-11408-1-git-send-email-jblunck@infradead.org> References: <1482332986-7599-1-git-send-email-jblunck@infradead.org> <1482508691-11408-1-git-send-email-jblunck@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v5 00/20] Decouple ethdev from PCI device X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2016 22:33:38 -0000 2016-12-23 16:57, Jan Blunck: > This repost addresses the review comments of Thomas Monjalon to completely > remove the ethdev helper to further decrease the coupling of the ethdev and > the eal layers. This required me to squash together all patches using the > rte_eth_dev_to_pci() helper into "Decouple from PCI device" patch. As > discussed privately I'll keep the PCI information in rte_eth_dev_info > untouched. Applied with some trivial fixes, thanks