From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41BD4A046B for ; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 14:26:03 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D39C24C6C; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 14:26:00 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com (out4-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.28]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAD7E2C60; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 14:25:58 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D8F322036; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 08:25:57 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sat, 29 Jun 2019 08:25:57 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=zUn8QmOXmx1K5pmEcX23KEuamAVZb+4nrFANmEEkQkM=; b=Gv9TW8P4c8DM MNgk1rer0/PeWyP8Gtq3+ZR6cAmelqE3RLi+a4v+nKpIcgLmNbrCyVmA002NaAKk bWs63t1SEjjDaSs3A+hsJ0z1Y1c7iKgWneEAMkH1EERCqneDre9I7mwRNae6A8Rt fG+UrUpowMW7PsFb1oI042v5UAmCKhA= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=zUn8QmOXmx1K5pmEcX23KEuamAVZb+4nrFANmEEkQ kM=; b=hsmE9tZfmGAOB65x54XJ3pL0pfvCrZbCt9T29iHqA05OhcmcQq0Zsg9cN CAninQ3LvJOTYCl1noEkv0XZWiQzBukF1RtizFYu3CRFXzJZqJt+XS4ExTFGWWZ8 cLxGt2XXQBIZZ+uZOfMGXXEdJ0n4DwxKcwxfa/pHK5xktBPakqCBSW51Myj/1TKA 2V6pIKaVgyDHPgTYIIUMk3Qrr5RYzmi8Z0F4UCwrrHK5hBHH+y+3rafkV7wEk63E Fr1gYFDcKk5BLDwTEfQPHPdc4pN7datJA/Du2F6ikr2uDaHS2s8W4igCjm52i1K7 /h36685elRWv8eiYzVp0PhIZ1JS7g== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduvddrvddvgdehfecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkph epjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhho mhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptd X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 58B9880062; Sat, 29 Jun 2019 08:25:55 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Honnappa Nagarahalli Cc: stable@dpdk.org, David Marchand , dev , "Yigit, Ferruh" , "Ruifeng Wang (Arm Technology China)" , nd Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2019 14:25:53 +0200 Message-ID: <3255247.Ic6D3jGGLI@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20190628034406.5399-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> <20190628184342.12260-1-honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v3 1/2] test/rcu: increase the size of num cores variable X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 28/06/2019 20:54, David Marchand: > On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 8:44 PM Honnappa Nagarahalli < > honnappa.nagarahalli@arm.com> wrote: > > > num_cores is of type uint8_t. This results in the following > > compilation error. > > > > test_rcu_qsbr_perf.c:649:16: error: comparison is always false > > due to limited range of data type [-Werror=type-limits] > > if (num_cores >= RTE_MAX_LCORE) { > > ^~ > > > > RTE_MAX_LCORE is set to 256 for armv8 config. > > > > Fixes: e6a14121f4ae ("test/rcu: remove arbitrary limit on max core count") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > > Signed-off-by: Honnappa Nagarahalli > > Reviewed-by: Ruifeng Wang > > Thanks. > Reviewed-by: David Marchand Series applied, thanks