From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f41.google.com (mail-wm0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A30972B93 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:11:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f41.google.com with SMTP id l132so229606283wmf.0 for ; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:11:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=82i5zInwnjqauea9qUmVQSnhqinurH9o6wQOmrvKthM=; b=EVWtWyzszXBDSOLUwF6e2nnPp0YUbrBduxob0ncKi9TOOHdgJUafGk7vJF7+ICtBDN aYAgBQOKt/8QmMotlifWEl+buudH13O/+GsIHh0YF5XQVaff7heZO0L6fUGRoWVPabuN 2P0Hm7kW4PONoo82VjCL4RannlWiB0iSHsdcfDw9oR7IAw1nXgXw2pD3mfF+cG9ZTNXN mKPqMQM8QRp62CDTV3AGTarBZMgj3HyWn/Ml/kr2dlTk3qpWZTMxardhDyOeT4OuPdTP C+zMFLXzMe5EpMSdA9XjD+JKvuuXnjDXTFcpNyYzom0mPksP6PcJsU0oklPSkW9bHGcu eQ+w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=82i5zInwnjqauea9qUmVQSnhqinurH9o6wQOmrvKthM=; b=AOjPp5SgFJzQMGud/chljaPtenMxsImrdm5ub8CDEPB+iC+PWyswgnbBCmJfcCnW4W VQ2SeZXhLjuDQ7NtqTjf1cb1s2twBp9kyn8BVlqVlUcckW7eVMVkTG90zCJIG9hXU1fR wKxKC7Nvm0+x0NqPjB0rF6F2A1vKbColLgvh9UUzMsHgfjuhktsVn7zGKHsaA1gVJ3MU ojfaqDDKIl7uSgQoGvc8ZYlb5JQgOCe7/RNTDZP7de3U4ZjPbp9/8vpoOXpZVeBjlq1r Ov+GqQdT/4gkzphIb21abvAY2s3ZG3GoRGbbgzo+ZuRGMIl9Ke3R9+EhZ9Wt1B51rfnB hRfw== X-Gm-Message-State: AE9vXwMjF6OA95n8Z7HjeuJyFtSj6QOKbKj6wVTr0EYdS0rhMw8bEaS6HykzRYBAQTW50Coq X-Received: by 10.28.141.6 with SMTP id p6mr5099281wmd.110.1474402267413; Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:11:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (251.224.154.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.154.224.251]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w129sm28949723wmd.9.2016.09.20.13.11.06 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 20 Sep 2016 13:11:06 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Matthew Hall Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Nikita Kozlov Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 22:11:04 +0200 Message-ID: <3263960.cPWMKkvuZx@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20160919212257.GA27713@mhcomputing.net> References: <20160919212257.GA27713@mhcomputing.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] LPM6 next hop size X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2016 20:11:07 -0000 2016-09-19 14:22, Matthew Hall: > On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:18:48PM +0200, Nikita Kozlov wrote: > > I have submitted a patch that, among other things, increase this size. > > But it needs some reviews: http://dpdk.org/dev/patchwork/patch/15295/ > > A whole ton of us submitted patches to fix LPM lately. > > But fixing LPM6 was deleted from the roadmap and never added in a future release. We do not need to have it in the roadmap for accepting a patch. > So we don't get any upstream support to put the patches together and add it in the official release. Please, will you help reviewing this patch?