From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5C161B84C for ; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 23:23:17 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 22EB520B0E; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:23:17 -0500 (EST) Received: from frontend2 ([10.202.2.161]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:23:17 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=mesmtp; bh=2Qe2aXa2JJyAt7UXKoMkAvROAs XVn6TrCdnxUbPGMPc=; b=Q2UgdV4tmc1pX/gtJf5zgNinypQmZp/gUNRcyioCEr hc931E18vPrEsyGAO7n1R8MDLZdR8fSgWzDRZlvfPfSoGX5+R5iUmhXvIMgTjbkI Oa3M7weZQswwe6H4pu50PFARGmiuA6lpi23Ua1n0WVDD1QbGOfBO9flKDzfMIvN7 8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=2Qe2aX a2JJyAt7UXKoMkAvROAsXVn6TrCdnxUbPGMPc=; b=sN0ESSFvCgO7XNiAD80YMo iDny6lIxRyV8FDN6L8B5nyokeN+Uj0VujRlTVlsmiS1bu1+9rXOJlRO/JGE3UI9P peLjT/NfgdNkM250O5ok6q5qvGgQRXoK9y+22F+taUvV8zZ441QnBAFrx9L69Ihw 1hwTvasraDi/CvU8DhHrfpxMJnxVNdekd34FBqoeJd6Qcz9Qh9h9kx19wBczY2cz 1I2dWo1teeZe2R+8m0gmvQKgNqqw1vsPd7+tarCtmm5Mk1tfyhOOq9+MFZOKG2sL oHdDD++j3eKe5JO5jtZlXMealG9+fnahTeztBkZNrOsY05RT9Ztk4r9SKKTFIP+A == X-ME-Sender: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C986A247FD; Wed, 31 Jan 2018 17:23:16 -0500 (EST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Remy Horton Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Ferruh Yigit , Wenzhuo Lu , Jingjing Wu Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 23:22:30 +0100 Message-ID: <3264128.6vgjGZLeKr@xps> In-Reply-To: References: <20180119132722.11120-1-remy.horton@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1] testpmd: fix incorrect port_id word size X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2018 22:23:17 -0000 20/01/2018 14:33, Ferruh Yigit: > On 1/19/2018 1:27 PM, Remy Horton wrote: > > "app/testpmd: fix incorrect port id word size" ? > > > The word size of port_id is now 16 bits, but there were parsing directives > > that assumed it was still of type UINT8, resulting in incorrect commandline > > parse results. > > > > Fixes: f14a210a65fe ("app: fix port id type") > > Cc: stable@dpdk.org > > > Signed-off-by: Remy Horton > > Reviewed-by: Ferruh Yigit Applied, thanks