From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f49.google.com (mail-wm0-f49.google.com [74.125.82.49]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB90C914 for ; Wed, 8 Mar 2017 16:39:29 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f49.google.com with SMTP id n11so34060746wma.0 for ; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 07:39:29 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rtnuxkvl9oTHldE2TtoccMLT5/MeXsH2xSnDzPwIS4o=; b=x5vs4nU7KiW4ZryOFp8qwgDNbPoA4fh/0XhyX3WcrmvCzwrX3hSXgq7V8xnP1iynya j4f419ldp9BliXgeJiDV2MFMSd2/rPCO2lJfKFLLFp6sid0LLFr9XYVPHOgh1oKpS5pr ZZZbTXfP4NARSB+NpIU5Cr/Fe73OWQHMPgBFfr2o8OhB0+dqZ5bF+kBMvfvTcL3He9Ht 7XmqwNPDxui41d9ajUOVRYtxUhct16IW3znXCUefEJjZCrn8h31zs0o2sirN7DtPHy7y t205bkpioupIXgKxY8h8jj3Y9d+rYFsZBSNb+huUqOLhCVdpvx5kzyg0dU4entvzkccg hO3A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rtnuxkvl9oTHldE2TtoccMLT5/MeXsH2xSnDzPwIS4o=; b=sFVqGOITblaLwIrH3Vy27P39uRJEjxf23braR3ssymNCmiW1vbOKv4Me/AFXLDSK3f ezpBHMiTxG7J2Z8PqzTk3obTVPcgrHpWJQcpuY+ClwdA9hA5mWrYWUbL38y6kEy0pqIW 3Y2hssiaMBuerDgKln1U4F0vhI9dOt8O00aKBsbDuKzcfje1ZheEyh8PBM6zXYUPoGGm zEkci6VXigAXqjdqmFV7xNOQ+tCPdDPgmRatzoRhYJmEDDl9oBxHSDgmjWjtXOm6CD/z Q6FttN698wu610ONoi44tDGHUlX0TwNvPrzZA3MXztYVik7lVIvLc9CK3BUdbSGyFjVz TPQg== X-Gm-Message-State: AMke39nVfWJUlvYa/94+Wt5HH3YZcbvEehNqnvR0ivg8C2QoSSrYehFruZfuQROop+DENsCa X-Received: by 10.28.35.151 with SMTP id j145mr23164962wmj.50.1488987569560; Wed, 08 Mar 2017 07:39:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id y4sm20303850wmy.5.2017.03.08.07.39.28 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 08 Mar 2017 07:39:28 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Hemant Agrawal Cc: Olivier MATZ , dev@dpdk.org, bruce.richardson@intel.com, shreyansh.jain@nxp.com, john.mcnamara@intel.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, jerin.jacob@caviumnetworks.com Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 16:39:28 +0100 Message-ID: <3284470.c3gGJi30Hp@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <521bf2d1-0393-c4ac-422e-96134880502a@nxp.com> References: <1487205586-6785-1-git-send-email-hemant.agrawal@nxp.com> <20170308100553.14ca39a7@glumotte.dev.6wind.com> <521bf2d1-0393-c4ac-422e-96134880502a@nxp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCHv8 19/46] pool/dpaa2: add DPAA2 hardware offloaded mempool X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Mar 2017 15:39:30 -0000 2017-03-08 18:22, Hemant Agrawal: > > On Fri, 3 Mar 2017 18:16:36 +0530, Hemant Agrawal > > wrote: > > I think the current mempool handlers should be moved first in a > > separate patch. Yes it should have been done earlier. > Are you seeing any benefit by making it a separate patch series? A separate patchset for moving mempool handlers will be easy to review and accept. If integrated in this series, it is kind of hidden and prevent the visibility and review it deserves. By the way the mempool move should be directly committed in the main repository, while this series targets next-net. > it will be difficult and tricky for us. The dpaa2_pool has a dependency > on mc bus patches. dpaa2_pmd has dependency on dpaa2_pool and mc buses. You will just have to rebase this series on top of the new one.