DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Schneide <schneide@qti.qualcomm.com>
Cc: dev@dpdk.org, Reshma Pattan <reshma.pattan@intel.com>,
	Jerin Jacob <jerinj@marvell.com>,
	Kiran Kumar K <kirankumark@marvell.com>,
	Nithin Dabilpuram <ndabilpuram@marvell.com>,
	Zhirun Yan <yanzhirun_163@163.com>,
	Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] pcapng: allow any protocol link type for the interface block
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2025 11:28:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3296173.BjyWNHgNrj@thomas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925170447.2ae8d5bf@hermes.local>

26/09/2025 02:04, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Wed, 27 Aug 2025 16:32:15 -0600
> Schneide <schneide@qti.qualcomm.com> wrote:
> 
> >  
> > +* pcapng: Changed the API for adding interfaces to include a link type argument.
> > +  The link type was previously hardcoded to the ethernet link type in the API.
> > +  This argument is added to ``rte_pcapng_add_interface``.
> > +  These functions are versioned to retain binary compatibility until the next LTS release.
> 
> Since link connector is now merged, and that wording might overlap and
> be confusing. Would be could to add reference to pcap-linktype.7 man
> page.

I'm not sure it overlaps.
RTE_ETH_LINK_CONNECTOR is about Ethernet cables while
pcap link type will be simply Ethernet type.

This being said, I don't understand the immediate benefit of this commit.
Why pcap link type would not be always Ethernet in DPDK case?
I think the only benefit is for future if other link types are added.
Is there something else I'm missing?



  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-27  9:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-08-27 15:38 [PATCH v1] " Schneide
2025-08-27 16:06 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-27 17:21 ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-08-27 22:32 ` [PATCH v2] " Schneide
2025-09-25 23:54   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-09-26  0:04   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-09-27  9:28     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-05-29 17:16 [PATCH] " Schneide
2025-06-05 23:02 ` [PATCH v2] " Schneide
2025-06-06 15:13   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-06 21:52 ` Schneide
2025-06-08 22:16   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-08 22:19   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-08 22:23   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-08 22:30   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-08 22:34   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-09 15:51     ` Dylan Schneider
2025-06-09 16:24       ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-16 14:29   ` Dylan Schneider
2025-06-24 15:15     ` Dylan Schneider
2025-06-09 21:19 ` Schneide
2025-06-16 18:05   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-26 13:57   ` Stephen Hemminger
2025-06-27 16:05   ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-06-27 17:39   ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-06-27 17:46     ` Dylan Schneider
2025-06-27 18:27       ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-06-30 13:50       ` Dylan Schneider
2025-06-30 14:28         ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-07-02 19:30           ` Dylan Schneider
2025-07-03 13:27             ` Thomas Monjalon
2025-07-03 16:29               ` Dylan Schneider
2025-07-03 16:41                 ` Thomas Monjalon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3296173.BjyWNHgNrj@thomas \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=jerinj@marvell.com \
    --cc=kirankumark@marvell.com \
    --cc=ndabilpuram@marvell.com \
    --cc=reshma.pattan@intel.com \
    --cc=schneide@qti.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    --cc=yanzhirun_163@163.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).