From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 05201A04C2; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:32:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56A721C1C2; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:32:46 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BF3B1C1C0 for ; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:32:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6B365C00DC; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:32:43 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:32:43 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= LSH7lU93tQN5wILMMxfukZV2rtEm4MPzdyAI6FKtdPI=; b=b/6gxHf+BtlrC/9e 890qzLFKuhXmPTAr1pkBtfiIWs/4dsokWu6uZsNQmyduYi/VsP9ca4rQSUhFvlxJ rwFDBMnNnfot+fRyq7OwbyvmGd5aX/dLbm7XLlW9GbGn/9pDoB9/2h7FKuNkxQSF QJ8ab4Y81+UlLOvMYuUiQ0gVr3TBParrs3ZnX2kej0VA8lT4tDZWwZG1poHs5N5l LtpJI7ijkULoGRnuCWkMmvYiDTSGmt9szEBOnhiqDtYO9bUZbVPD4zJNUOreO9VW WOhBn9LsFvBHuKIULVSKdGvKTZq2kLEdyTS7s0uk2t0KjX3nmTEVIiD/fAEjtvT3 Jw/gUw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=LSH7lU93tQN5wILMMxfukZV2rtEm4MPzdyAI6FKtd PI=; b=GGvaUVoqzHbxoj/ff+fu55YtJljcwFQFU4vfOG126p4KBXEWu0UayObTS IltfVGsD1gAXWRwj71doGHbLGHi0MRZg0yJEiWk4PBoFhNDg3aUKXeQdtlUA7fMz YCq60Fs4MUgVh9/4sI9dq40wWDLC4BZXk7H1UKQTRpuco8ZD87HPsM+TD0nBB/0J oO+PtWunSb7fFvAchbKeh+ZMrKGEu9f2BFjrjPUSoxUTbz8F71Xx7Ev9kC5Y3zZt 9SB1lrbJLbTb9RDXRZmUnVaKv88XAIxilTBGFdlk93gKzOLxVmFtButcSoqYzIOg XNL8H3TKPMon6/MRTE6lT6/6MhRLg== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduiedrledvgdeihecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepleefrdeirddugeelrdduudegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivg eptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdr nhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (114.149.6.93.rev.sfr.net [93.6.149.114]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 54F8830606FB; Wed, 12 Aug 2020 09:32:42 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, david.marchand@redhat.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, John McNamara , Marko Kovacevic Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 15:32:40 +0200 Message-ID: <3302242.5n1W8FZEAv@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200812124739.GC312@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> References: <20200812092915.2325511-1-thomas@monjalon.net> <20200812124739.GC312@bricha3-MOBL.ger.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] switch default git branch name to main X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 12/08/2020 14:47, Bruce Richardson: > On Wed, Aug 12, 2020 at 11:29:15AM +0200, Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > The default git branch of the main DPDK repository has been renamed > > from master to main. > > > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon [...] > > -The backup maintainer for the master tree should be selected from the existing sub-tree maintainers from the project. > > +The backup maintainer for the main tree should be selected > > +from the existing sub-tree maintainers of the project. > > This does not need to be a straight master -> main replacement. I wonder if > "release tree" would be a better name. However, "main" is probably clear > enough, so I'm ok to keep this as suggested here. "release tree" does not distinguish from stable releases. I agree "main" is not ideal to identify the tree, but I don't see any better wording. [...] > > Any release of DPDK can be designated as a Stable Release if a > > maintainer volunteers to maintain it and there is a commitment from major > > contributors to validate it before releases. If a release is to be designated > > -as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the master release. > > +as a Stable Release, it should be done by 1 month after the main release. > > Not sure if this the most readable. The term "release" might be better > replaced with "version" to allow the use of "release" as a verb for > readability. > > "Any release version of DPDK can be designated a Stable Release if ... > If a version is to be a "Stable Release", it should be designated as such > within one month of that version being initially released" You wording is a lot better. I take it, thanks. > As-is or with above suggestions, this seems fine. > > Acked-by: Bruce Richardson Applied with last suggestion, thanks