From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f43.google.com (mail-wm0-f43.google.com [74.125.82.43]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2986C568A for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 16:26:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: by mail-wm0-f43.google.com with SMTP id n129so133357130wmn.1 for ; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:26:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9QxAjbVDKE4AtejQKZL68o4kuanllyI/c1aRkwfYON0=; b=TJI90RT8avZYRpprEo2NB4NRZsTR/0LBy0UVi/EF5A/wwHpa187i/FTLjLbiD88Zo/ U6ivE9EyssTz4AIyajT4Xfq87BOSpksbrroHWgrdvGxS7ghrAu7IwqOJ787A74lNg2Gj vI6VXZThLQ2/PybRWea1rDQ45DgvkQnXk8DObyymYo1APyZhFFFN+CERkMmQXOuaaMdL 0h+u91Bqq+6kwDmD/Em8sotY1amEpa630h9GWUu0vzxk7k6ziD0RVRsaqtuzKzHJU1Lg 8QuXjELLkpxhFf8R1nqjcW/UGmBsl3MheiPETOJjjXFqyxK5dTV/Zdk1hFSPfy7FeNjw t4qg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=9QxAjbVDKE4AtejQKZL68o4kuanllyI/c1aRkwfYON0=; b=ZX4Yjd3A4EUZWc7ql0YIhZqGk3hAi4lnCMck05gqPBrkI3Cb7pH5Z0eKlckUUnBRar EM21I2rJtFz22HUMj+740zAFWiFQMocr1ALcdGFdfGmISBu+/PdRE0URNAJl0KYuUcOt O6Gb/aIx/aExyV+goohTadY/kynIaHZSLTMYxNKfGEvbYx7iwRy7FkxoUKDx4Dgz9UJm aNCuwLNdAXmvLfGdSVjrEbSHnxhld+4UTJw4+HTX5ssjuiEQjRr5hmD6QP8bC2qaIDrO e1B+CxQwGe6QQjVoTgftRTnASsxhNyS0JxwMimXavLLCh+W/dbjFuItEwaMWEatxyDin 2qhg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tKHRSgelMx8vTVosGAnkpsPOyyxzGozBTN9Sadlt0fWZdwOtkiTODLshnJ+3SY3wljO X-Received: by 10.194.239.100 with SMTP id vr4mr4572643wjc.19.1464100008966; Tue, 24 May 2016 07:26:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d5sm3520806wje.20.2016.05.24.07.26.48 for (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 24 May 2016 07:26:48 -0700 (PDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: dev@dpdk.org Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 16:26:47 +0200 Message-ID: <33283186.tgNgKiA73h@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.1.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <1461071789-14171-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> References: <1461071789-14171-1-git-send-email-thomas.monjalon@6wind.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] scripts: ignore bit macro in checkpatch X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 May 2016 14:26:49 -0000 2016-04-19 15:16, Thomas Monjalon: > It was suggesting to use a Linux macro: > CHECK:BIT_MACRO: Prefer using the BIT macro > > It is ignored because it is a false positive in DPDK case. > > Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon Applied By the way, maybe that someone would like to implement RTE_BIT?