DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>,
	Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com>,
	Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
Cc: Lance Richardson <lance.richardson@broadcom.com>,
	dpdk-dev <dev@dpdk.org>,
	Bruce Richardson <bruce.richardson@intel.com>,
	Andrew Rybchenko <arybchenko@solarflare.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH] net/bnxt: allow configuring vector mode
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 19:13:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3333271.ZzFAyJQhcr@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200331085830.343dc7e6@hermes.lan>

31/03/2020 17:58, Stephen Hemminger:
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2020 17:43:55 +0200
> Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net> wrote:
> > 31/03/2020 16:31, Ajit Khaparde:
> > > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 4:36 AM Ferruh Yigit <ferruh.yigit@intel.com> wrote:
> > > > I saw Ajit merged this patch to brcm tree, but I am not sure about it. We
> > > > have
> > > > already removed this compile time option from some PMDs, and driver tries
> > > > to
> > > > detect to use or not to use vectorization transparently.
> > > >
> > > > This config is also a problem for the meson, which always sets the flag in
> > > > a
> > > > hardcoded way.
> > > >
> > > > But also I am not sure about to need to enable/disable vectorization
> > > > explicitly,
> > > > this patch seems because of this need. As far as I remember in the past
> > > > this
> > > > type of runtime configuration rejected to not make driver configuration
> > > > more
> > > > complex.  
> > > 
> > > Since we need a way to disable or enable vector mode.  
> > 
> > Why do you need to disable vector optimization?
> > Is it for debugging?
> 
> The rte_flow mark operation does not work with the vector optimization.
> 
> The choice to use vector mode is done by the driver earlier in
> the initialization process, and then when application programs rte_flow
> it has a problem; the flow create would fail.

Could we imagine switching the Rx implementation dynamically between 2 bursts?



  reply	other threads:[~2020-03-31 17:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-05  6:45 [dpdk-dev] " Stephen Hemminger
2020-03-05 20:10 ` Lance Richardson
2020-03-05 22:18   ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-03-31 11:36     ` [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] " Ferruh Yigit
2020-03-31 14:31       ` Ajit Khaparde
2020-03-31 15:43         ` Thomas Monjalon
2020-03-31 15:58           ` Stephen Hemminger
2020-03-31 17:13             ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]
2020-03-24  4:02 ` [dpdk-dev] " Ajit Khaparde
2020-04-24 17:32 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] net/bnxt: disable vector mode if flow mark is used Stephen Hemminger

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3333271.ZzFAyJQhcr@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
    --cc=arybchenko@solarflare.com \
    --cc=bruce.richardson@intel.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=ferruh.yigit@intel.com \
    --cc=lance.richardson@broadcom.com \
    --cc=stephen@networkplumber.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).