From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EAFBA04B5; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:18:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0DE631D698; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:18:08 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout5-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.21]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F23E51D67B; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:18:05 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD8D8E2C; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:18:04 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:18:05 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= H79/1tG5yGI75OUvAG0BdVUL+4LM8yk7pCu0SlT0cME=; b=Fwpt86r8I3bUCbFn Q9uaQMw1oSoYiHc6OjEHlY6kWN+UFOHitqzAeiO5oRZ0Eo2wTUdXYWhu6DEM0KjO NqfbfKpI0bxbD3z2t84FE7zKPQgMWA0zjlopBQBEhhkwIt92kgAaA1sZU0JZ9ODB hb4mdA2X4+5+RuDiw3HynC6cbz5BXKNd/5Wh005GNmDqg06c+nNP0LZB6TnT/jfe uxjgeH9J4EezJycvZVcBRTIk5qZGZW2BZSRmnfIc1vCH2i7Grth+3aPxV/oKUMHz Lo0vBrGWdNk6B/Gg0AkYhGy9aynI/ljHz7/I+0mOfhTZsdNWfnczSK4BPaclbrkP QUbjgg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=H79/1tG5yGI75OUvAG0BdVUL+4LM8yk7pCu0SlT0c ME=; b=RZyQWwbxbhttutjKvd75d4NMVQs2QvZuwYd6+Vi/Ol88h3zr+dqF/+hKH Imlca5lMDqQKnXqDsLTKxGh/MJ1KvVXaPEW0v7hawwqfLr83x4rT3jU/BA/Slmf5 B+smpRIL3pvryc6GgPtHc8q4GaHPVWnCvWQmvm+uPq8Hg9Uy0zC3hPlWYsSy1s5r g4gAZKej4/FJhI1uXmlfn9Q1+c0gg/kj1L8V2WrAnSCd8fcoidLi+v0k1eOKUE9d dA4KPWQxg5EgBskIb30pHIKPPiaUPlZEffjOyyqQRd3wL/3BAhFk/Y7uYOXEebHK lwcrUXXf9xCozhWQdFMdeiCDmN5nQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrudeggdellecutefuodetggdotefrodftvf curfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfghnecu uegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenuc fjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghs ucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucggtf frrghtthgvrhhnpedugefgvdefudfftdefgeelgffhueekgfffhfeujedtteeutdejueei iedvffegheenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuih iivgepudenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhho nhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 236393064683; Tue, 22 Sep 2020 12:18:03 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger , techboard@dpdk.org Cc: David Marchand , techboard@dpdk.org, dev , Luca Boccassi , "Mcnamara, John" , Thomas Monjalon Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2020 18:18:02 +0200 Message-ID: <33429326.yKmoO7Tkig@thomas> In-Reply-To: <8969299.nXlkhJugru@thomas> References: <20200613000055.7909-1-stephen@networkplumber.org> <20200922072846.2b320a52@hermes.lan> <8969299.nXlkhJugru@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-techboard] [PATCH v3 00/10] rename blacklist/whitelist to block/allow X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 22/09/2020 18:16, Thomas Monjalon: > 22/09/2020 16:28, Stephen Hemminger: > > On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 12:01:27 +0200 > > Thomas Monjalon wrote: > > > > > 14/07/2020 07:33, Stephen Hemminger: > > > > On Fri, 10 Jul 2020 17:06:11 +0200 > > > > David Marchand wrote: > > > > > > > > > About deprecating existing API/EAL flags in this release, this should > > > > > go through the standard deprecation process. > > > > > I would go with introducing new options + full compatibility + a > > > > > deprecation notice in the 20.08 release. > > > > > The actual deprecation/API flagging will go in 20.11. > > > > > Removal will come later. > > > > > > > > Like Make deprecation for 20.08 will leave the flags but add nag. > > > > Want to make full removal in 20.11. Otherwise it will end up being 21.11 > > > > which is too far out. > > > > > > Excuse me I may lack a bit of context. > > > Are you asking for removing some EAL options without following > > > the deprecation process? > > > > These were in the 20.08 deprecation notice. > > Do you mean this? > " > The ``master-lcore`` argument to testpmd will be replaced > with ``initial-lcore``. The old ``master-lcore`` argument > will produce a runtime notification in 20.11 release, and > be removed completely in a future release. > " For completeness, I see this as well: " The command line arguments to ``rte_eal_init`` will change from ``-b, --pci-blacklist`` to ``-x, --exclude`` and ``-w, --pci-whitelist`` to ``-i, --include``. The old command line arguments will continue to be accepted in 20.11 but will cause a runtime warning message. The old arguments will be removed in a future release. "