DPDK patches and discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@mellanox.com>
Cc: stable@dpdk.org, dev@dpdk.org, viacheslavo@mellanox.com,
	matan@mellanox.com, stable@dpdk.org,
	Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [dpdk-stable] [PATCH v2] mbuf: optimize memory loads during mbuf freeing
Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 03:46:45 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3368517.MVdQ21Qd56@xps> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200327081314.GD6327@platinum>

27/03/2020 09:13, Olivier Matz:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 03:55:15PM +0000, Alexander Kozyrev wrote:
> > Introduction of pinned external buffers doubled memory loads in the
> > rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg() function. Analysis of the generated assembly
> > code shows unnecessary load of the pool field of the rte_mbuf structure.
> > Here is the snippet of the assembly for "if (!RTE_MBUF_DIRECT(m))":
> > Before the change the code was:
> > 	movq  0x18(%rbx), %rax // load the ol_flags field
> > 	test %r13, %rax	       // check if ol_flags equals to 0x60...0
> > 	jz 0x9a8718 <Block 2>  // jump out to "if (m->next != NULL)"
> > After the change the code became:
> > 	movq  0x18(%rbx), %rax // load ol_flags
> > 	test %r14, %rax	       // check if ol_flags equals to 0x60...0
> > 	jnz 0x9bea38 <Block 2> // jump in to "if (!RTE_MBUF_HAS_EXTBUF(m)"
> > 	movq  0x48(%rbx), %rax // load the pool field
> > 	jmp 0x9bea78 <Block 7> // jump out to "if (m->next != NULL)"
> > Look like this absolutely unneeded memory load of the pool field is an
> > optimization for the external buffer case in GCC (4.8.5), since Clang
> > generates the same assembly for both before and after the change versions.
> > Plus, GCC favors the external buffer case over the simple case.
> > This assembly code layout causes the performance degradation because the
> > rte_pktmbuf_prefree_seg() function is a part of a very hot path.
> > Workaround this compilation issue by moving the check for pinned buffer
> > apart from the check for external buffer and restore the initial code
> > flow that favors the direct mbuf case over the external one.
> > 
> > Fixes: 6ef1107ad4c6 ("mbuf: detach mbuf with pinned external buffer")
> > Cc: stable@dpdk.org
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Kozyrev <akozyrev@mellanox.com>
> > Acked-by: Viacheslav Ovsiienko <viacheslavo@mellanox.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Olivier Matz <olivier.matz@6wind.com>
> 
> Thanks!

Applied, thanks




      reply	other threads:[~2020-03-31  1:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-03-16 18:31 [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] " Alexander Kozyrev
2020-03-19  9:30 ` Olivier Matz
2020-03-20 15:35   ` Alexander Kozyrev
2020-03-20 15:55 ` [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2] " Alexander Kozyrev
2020-03-27  8:13   ` Olivier Matz
2020-03-31  1:46     ` Thomas Monjalon [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3368517.MVdQ21Qd56@xps \
    --to=thomas@monjalon.net \
    --cc=akozyrev@mellanox.com \
    --cc=dev@dpdk.org \
    --cc=matan@mellanox.com \
    --cc=olivier.matz@6wind.com \
    --cc=stable@dpdk.org \
    --cc=viacheslavo@mellanox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).