From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
Received: from mail-wg0-f41.google.com (mail-wg0-f41.google.com [74.125.82.41])
 by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707E4590F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:26:50 +0100 (CET)
Received: by mail-wg0-f41.google.com with SMTP id n12so6856392wgh.0
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
 d=1e100.net; s=20130820;
 h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:organization
 :user-agent:in-reply-to:references:mime-version
 :content-transfer-encoding:content-type;
 bh=s7BX4jN0IXxqAtuUziFrLkJ++y3nyctzrUompiDjUaI=;
 b=By6u4/Chr4BzzLxkbxW487QvT2JEpLWUWeKEMJ/WjUfRCduewMqcdBxqFuU5JJTNlz
 9Lys8eB+bqiPlzfGPhfgIqGvByvAud7rLDlVVXzlWsDlVGiHNwUBiE7EumXoGjX3mT9G
 Z5ayFYF2oN3vZmfOPNqbDShOIlsVRsTiDDZawSsp+GlStWFQlqL+eKOE8ZFCrMjxTgnO
 v7ecmW4EdXbYCZknU2rmUSRr6dNgBlFECEZsIUkKbLCcN8twoJHdDM38HLBN9h/xniNW
 Qq6oqc7sD/515N9tK5J+VmvIPNsaCULE8kMojm5GoI/Hs/gJpr1CzoY9Rw9gwbex+30E
 /NyQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkJ2bLcZG9/+3CqYDcX/xNCf8hjwoUzmdgmKF1vLwhUV2QT2gT5OvD2DdQHjubf4aYgbJZW
X-Received: by 10.194.203.2 with SMTP id km2mr890071wjc.72.1395224901681;
 Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:28:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from xps13.localnet (6wind.net2.nerim.net. [213.41.180.237])
 by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i7sm42306388wib.1.2014.03.19.03.28.19
 for <multiple recipients>
 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128);
 Wed, 19 Mar 2014 03:28:19 -0700 (PDT)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas.monjalon@6wind.com>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 11:28:19 +0100
Message-ID: <3378875.vgnsJ2253J@xps13>
Organization: 6WIND
User-Agent: KMail/4.12.3 (Linux/3.13.6-1-ARCH; KDE/4.12.3; x86_64; ; )
In-Reply-To: <CADEmHi3NDBT+50GAKaAXVKSKebpCeSTnBGBc6o_rTR-BchhkQQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20140318135859.53fac97c@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
 <CADEmHi3NDBT+50GAKaAXVKSKebpCeSTnBGBc6o_rTR-BchhkQQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] patchwork for dpdk.org?
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://dpdk.org/ml/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Mar 2014 10:26:50 -0000

18/03/2014 16:31, Kyle Mestery:
> stephen@networkplumber.org wrote:
> > Anybody considered setting up patchwork to track patches on this list?
> > 
> > If not familiar, patchwork is a back end which maintainers and developers
> > can keep track of patches submitted and make sure of the status (accepted,
> > rejected, review, etc).
> 
> +1 for patchwork.

I agree. Installing patchwork on dpdk.org is planned.

I wasn't available last weeks so I'm starting to review the recent patches.
By the way, it's good news that we now need such tools to manage 
contributions.
-- 
Thomas