From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>
Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124])
	by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 92947A0544;
	Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:18:07 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 89E6E1C022;
	Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:18:06 +0100 (CET)
Received: from new2-smtp.messagingengine.com (new2-smtp.messagingengine.com
 [66.111.4.224]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8162C1C01F
 for <dev@dpdk.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:18:04 +0100 (CET)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41])
 by mailnew.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76B44454;
 Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:18:02 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162])
 by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:18:02 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h=
 from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references
 :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp;
 bh=IcEVGfq8oz4X2NIQvzVmXa8lsYtj2IwBoJD/m7R26Sc=; b=SM2PlUcG1SgD
 0m3p9QGWzZhr4AGYopl/u85++j2UIFy1Wg+nCXSbvoLFmaetiApoCGm/jH2vAp44
 d0mJsR6c31dsy+xbtnincKqn3TfZmQU1+X4kdFs44m7HonFBhs3kSSoBZlSWouCj
 7P+fN36a/rQdRfsvT0nQlD/W0eBmzZo=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
 messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type
 :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references
 :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender
 :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=IcEVGfq8oz4X2NIQvzVmXa8lsYtj2IwBoJD/m7R26
 Sc=; b=mu4Mb5cNx9zGhFjiG/l7cw2sHkkN4ZjWHf+fpXN7xCNvaAq+lxcQdPT7P
 FD5zbFJI08oimKPElE6dma0Jwptvk33kDZI4h8nA7nD/T5ybokjOvATWkVOwX5Gu
 v6g1adT8cfS7JCZ6SVt6MlMH/uJyosEK7LagbtOKdNqhcTWOP78GmGrlpwW8d46S
 T6SglEtRH7drl2AT6D7RxzAEDoCmSGjVy5HleRdicEkuFJ610+XZXfndh86zAqap
 jPJCb0GDQr1sXxwn3ZLV+baXCRy8JRNbBeSWiz7LQPe/klJiN8UZM1Jh8qFK8qR+
 IhdJFGo/JVaOeWFdoyk5GkjlPm2lg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:GstFXvl4i0VkGj99gdt8rxSv6gEPZrb1NUdZtZ2A6Sw6OKCwDR9a6g>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrieekgdduieduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf
 fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen
 uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucenucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfure
 dttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhmrghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshes
 mhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenucfkphepjeejrddufeegrddvtdefrddukeegnecuve
 hluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepthhhohhmrghs
 sehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:GstFXm8LYu4mJhe8Mp8ob0-84JmAkJ3XcMSxyD4jKKRXpjKUgeKlZA>
 <xmx:GstFXhNYiaUGp5hoZ8ajkKhFq9uOs-YaNZyRVHu1_G394YJU2aBWJQ>
 <xmx:GstFXp0VJg4_At4l2Z9PyrQ6xY1bWKyvNxFth_aGp_cLdoPEZYS9dg>
 <xmx:GstFXsyuqrFnij0XHM48mEZynqrSZQC3Q4mEd5b81-9zaEE3fc4a2A>
Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184])
 by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 0A16A3280064;
 Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:18:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>
To: dwilder <dwilder@us.ibm.com>
Cc: david.marchand@redhat.com, anatoly.burakov@intel.com, aconole@redhat.com,
 maicolgabriel@hotmail.com, ferruh.yigit@intel.com, arybchenko@solarflare.com,
 dev@dpdk.org, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, drc@linux.vnet.ibm.com, wilder@us.ibm.com
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 23:17:59 +0100
Message-ID: <3387752.bqPgKRP4r2@xps>
In-Reply-To: <c28b9d76f173bfb19b18866aff8259be@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
References: <20200213202442.19674-1-dwilder@us.ibm.com>
 <2695382.dT8XKq9c71@xps>
 <c28b9d76f173bfb19b18866aff8259be@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v1 1/2] devtools: allow test-null.sh to run
	on ppc64le
X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions <dev.dpdk.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/options/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mails.dpdk.org/archives/dev/>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@dpdk.org>
List-Help: <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://mails.dpdk.org/listinfo/dev>,
 <mailto:dev-request@dpdk.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org
Sender: "dev" <dev-bounces@dpdk.org>

13/02/2020 21:58, dwilder:
> On 2020-02-13 12:32, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> > 13/02/2020 21:24, David Wilder:
> >> - The --no-huge option requires iova-mode=VA.
> >>   On ppc64le iova-mode defaults to PA therefor
> >>   VA mode must be explicitly set.
> > 
> > Should we make VA mode automatic when using --no-huge?
> > Should we log an error message when using --no-huge with PA mode?
> 
> Logging a messages sounds like a good idea.  Ignoring the users request 
> of iova-mode=PA (in the case of x86) and just switching modes would be 
> bad.

Yes, I mean for ppc64, if --no-huge is specified,
would you like to change the default to VA mode?