From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-wm0-f53.google.com (mail-wm0-f53.google.com [74.125.82.53]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 799715583 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:07:04 +0100 (CET) Received: by mail-wm0-f53.google.com with SMTP id a197so360772930wmd.0 for ; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 03:07:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=6wind-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=goJdkLbhnrn+DzOgj591bcMwmjnGzMDeBWAmyN6pqXg=; b=taRvJlVOc915tIlOnhyY93gNtpbCRHNNh5cEA52h60WjNp+CPVhB8p0rYEnIIgYknB j8MPWTppy8FI6X65fjQqeSoPSd8f0O+a1VFXByl1VTrTuJBxVQ/UWfH7+qxR2lcNA8Ja 0/Ni/wYty0+MYrxNFDCzJME+QD33ted/h2C0cNCkm2MB01Y9hKeGfgpZSZg4L11bCA3L hXykrMdf+l8i+ONd9nmF3Pk7Me3nwONccozrqstyXYHZ7JwUszyPNxJcSlz4eTgjkbRT I102cta0VVh6izYwWCzlmCS6AjrxIUTL4cUS28GrRVY2eAWSPTKmeU/ekPT+ABbyJuqe 4Bjw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:user-agent :in-reply-to:references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=goJdkLbhnrn+DzOgj591bcMwmjnGzMDeBWAmyN6pqXg=; b=RzugVEhtVE7dljYlT5PuPRkH9wEbwvLpXoGvmC6fQ8wz3U04kCPxe5HFQ+VvkHFFGo FmJk9SvEMbHL8ia+N61uRucIBygyZgB5ivPZeld6/kg74NVBpGWMPjln2w+lRYO8RPBw +6XdPDtAqr20iX/0n4V6LbXvpWW8fH9dwIg0Eoc0DRJcvi/dGGa9znm+ov6kPnGtfJZa Zw3ewrVqGqmB/4pFMIQsbrbcnXtB7Xxp7CK6rmn4QFjN8P4kFzgKEVamYBppVgE3i5Ot 64nHea6/RND+KLzLn9puZ2OKBII8Dlh2z3e/PDhSDccYMP4d25PP8RLKw2xve/Zn0nme OG6Q== X-Gm-Message-State: ABUngveaWTIEli7N/5ecq1Gj5ArzCx5nSVnGHebtRI1HF58cbsyG20Ylv+FL3hgCvX11TdY2 X-Received: by 10.28.142.72 with SMTP id q69mr19145028wmd.89.1478776024226; Thu, 10 Nov 2016 03:07:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from xps13.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net. [77.134.203.184]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id f10sm4821551wjl.28.2016.11.10.03.07.03 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 10 Nov 2016 03:07:03 -0800 (PST) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Stephen Hemminger Cc: Jianbo Liu , David Marchand , Shreyansh Jain , dev@dpdk.org Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 12:07:02 +0100 Message-ID: <3418950.5t2zjhjnTA@xps13> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (Linux/4.5.4-1-ARCH; KDE/4.14.11; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Clarification for eth_driver changes X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: patches and discussions about DPDK List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2016 11:07:04 -0000 Hi Stephen, 2016-11-10 02:51, Stephen Hemminger: > I also think drv_flags should part of device not PCI. Most of the flags > there like link state support are generic. If it isn't changed for this > release will probably have to break ABI to fully support VMBUS When do you plan to send VMBUS patches? Could you send a deprecation notice for this change? Are you aware of the work started by Shreyansh to have a generic bus model? Could you help in 17.02 timeframe to have a solid bus model? Thanks