From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8BA6A0350; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 23:43:54 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968B41D9DB; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 23:43:53 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com (out3-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.27]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8434E1D9D5 for ; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 23:43:51 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0E5875C00B3; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:43:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:43:51 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= vSBiNN9TqF+pBpq6gXwZV/bY14A1hZ05c2R2IH8pCV0=; b=hyVzCZK58xw3KKC+ qL7H4e6aIm64722qMkRL620yqOJAxGePwWnNf1iaVOoVZaXth9FlbBubib5juqkg u6JAVMRAY+fnuZRxL2tVB14XGB+vp4ulFBmbTtdgOHoYmUqf2rIaiPuoHQ4ZZEFZ mXOgkBMkaFjPLGZEQLO5QAuqb1qUBgjY+k1cJ4lBBUrl4Lt+zcQHvG4hTWXRA8vu 157DZ44wDQEUCaSxK2mEToLICpW3t06VpgyJwJ3g1AfxxQZBDMKw50ssb9NftPrg CqMCYftjclivJBr7Io22SEFSG6W3yBrLx8kCqBl/CFhV9mhyPzZwmpbVrM9MKji/ e0bZoQ== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=vSBiNN9TqF+pBpq6gXwZV/bY14A1hZ05c2R2IH8pC V0=; b=XJZDdCjKI4e23AsBL4OSmD63ZbLpmYzru+pvae5EZI5W8Om6dvo9JETY4 xa1KjfEpV0beAP5PXJYDINuaF6/onvvq+UtTzaoMdhL0sF8vhmNbe/bl6Mj290Iq ENRuBd2OGBat/Mu3VE083HLoHziT0UWLf5Is85B/venGn3YW4PGIixo/Gtcn6x7o Tc5N7FbZFzjHtzQffxJNzDchAQnAq4op5I9/HDmZ0olGg+cB69OaQHbZlfDRj4Dy OJk94nSXRWvn37TXFTleE4zdOcrV2Na9OnHF1v1ueoYci8Ykn6dey3VLVbATSfpB +J86gNtGGaqDmIdxYmmbk7xHdE+oA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduhedrudekkedgtdduucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A97B330676BE; Wed, 24 Jun 2020 17:43:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Konstantin Ananyev Cc: dev@dpdk.org, jerinj@marvell.com, stephen@networkplumber.org, mb@smartsharesystems.com Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2020 23:43:48 +0200 Message-ID: <3419322.uExR7qWTGc@thomas> In-Reply-To: <20200527141653.15576-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> References: <20200518155245.11380-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> <20200527141653.15576-1-konstantin.ananyev@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 0/5] bpf: add support for BPF_ABS/BPF_IND instructions X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 27/05/2020 16:16, Konstantin Ananyev: > To fill the gap with linux kernel eBPF implementation, > add support for two non-generic instructions: > (BPF_ABS | | BPF_LD) and (BPF_IND | | BPF_LD) > which are used to access packet data in a safe manner. > Make necessary changes in BPF verifier, interpreter and x86 JIT code. > > Konstantin Ananyev (5): > test/bpf: fix few small issues > bpf: fix add/sub min/max estimations > bpf: add support for packet data load instructions > test/bpf: add new test cases for mbuf load instructions > bpf: x86 JIT support for packet data load instructions Applied, thanks