From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86ED2A0A0F; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:55:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7469C141C91; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:55:48 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com (out1-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3F38141C86 for ; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:55:47 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 397595C00D9; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:55:46 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:55:46 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm1; bh= MaiPq/LRIoQ88iU/BGb+EOU2lR1cXysuDr+ktzB5oes=; b=GduuHKOR51aJ27Ef 0exMfC7WV4xQ1FyxjXUOfXb/gWb/jsGjWQojbUFormd/wpskUI0ERzO5OCKFyK1I sbQlR/wUa7bdChq0eWZFa1YWeVdybztxpWL2vR7U8perxrmdmie1w1eJmTujltJE j2JoEqz7ktrjVNtJCk3n1Z7sb5nujX3a3TqMW4sBP9ecXZW99Byv017RTtzFBW9D il3VZQeGhygZ50PTpnZx5TPdau6w0pTlPwIFdiqU/IdxibSD65xiriTo2oog3Pty NACLX+mcos6Wa8tajY4uiUa0lE61EuStzlzN0V4Mtk0brKyPjYB1JniwCC5w88jk izuSpA== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=MaiPq/LRIoQ88iU/BGb+EOU2lR1cXysuDr+ktzB5o es=; b=JLBL7B3IZq7r5Ejheg0jurhV/V8OwGtUyyiU3EJnNLFAYuBeJhym+fgVS ANsHA5eJ8cHdc85zb0RCf5h38F0A1RTNLgmYMndfWov6u+6zIwcmXqfCfvXcO4Vv dVAN3HlUZD18zQIqc7JfzLyaD0iz+35qyzz+yeoxuF7V/UaJX5EW9FWKj0dqKy0U bgFOPwozhZco1ebsInbRLlO5JyYY7zcyDx/pJPNAq5KrvHhfOtE0BMK0Ow+m2RVs mKOIEibSbUQ+Aey2xjSgGmbWTH4KItSCjH/dACnKLAqd48Z/s6gy4gpMHGJ6emXX hSEQn+ZP9nJPkG98/KoKivaspVqww== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrudelhedgvddvucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtqhertddttdejnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepkeethedtieevhfeigeejleegudefjeehkeekteeuveeiuedvveeu tdejveehveetnecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucevlhhushhtvghruf hiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghl ohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 766BB24005B; Fri, 16 Apr 2021 05:55:44 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: David Marchand Cc: Juraj =?utf-8?B?TGlua2XFoQ==?= , "dev@dpdk.org" , "mdr@ashroe.eu" , Aaron Conole , Michael Santana , Honnappa Nagarahalli , Bruce Richardson Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:55:43 +0200 Message-ID: <3439164.eiPVtjLgbP@thomas> In-Reply-To: References: <20210415163230.22263-1-david.marchand@redhat.com> <1882583.4QfryVaJDx@thomas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] ci: fix ABI reference generation X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 16/04/2021 11:49, David Marchand: > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 11:20 AM Thomas Monjalon wr= ote: > > 16/04/2021 11:17, David Marchand: > > > On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 8:39 AM Juraj Linke=C5=A1 wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Stick to a compatible configuration passing -Dmachine=3Ddefault. > > > > > > > > > > Note: the breakage was not seen earlier this week as I guess the = CI workers are > > > > > using a cached ABI reference for v20.11. > > > > > > > > > > Fixes: 5b3a6ca6fd28 ("build: alias default build as generic") > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Marchand > > > > > > > > Reviewed-by: Juraj Linke=C5=A1 > > > > > > > > Do we want to change this back to -Dmachine=3Dgeneric after next re= lease? > > > > > > This seems fine to me. > > > > If we change back in 21.08, we won't be able to test 21.08 > > against 20.11 or 21.02, right? > > Wouldn't be better to wait 21.11? >=20 > I considered this too, but here, in Travis/GHA, we test only against > the n-1 release. Yes. If we don't plan to change our CI test, that's fine.