Re: [PATCH v10] examples/ptp: replace terms master and slave

[Thomas Monjalon <thomas@monjalon.net>]

24/10/2024 04:06, Ajit Khaparde:
> On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 10:26 AM Ajit Khaparde
> <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 22, 2024 at 9:39 AM Stephen Hemminger
> > <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Fri, 14 Jun 2024 08:41:07 -0700
> > > Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Remove one of the few remaining uses of master/slave.
> > > >
> > > > The IEEE 1588 standard has been updated to remove the use
> > > > of master-slave terminology. Change the sample to Use the terms
> > > > recommended by IEEE 1588g-2022 amendment.
> > > >
> > > >   In place of the term “master”, use the term “timeTransmitter”.
> > > >   In place of the term “slave”, use the term “timeReceiver”.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
> > > > Reviewed-by: Somnath Kotur <somnath.kotur@broadcom.com>
> Acked-by: Ajit Khaparde <ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com>
> Patch applied to dpdk-next-net-brcm for-next-net branch.

Merged in main with some rebase effort because of a new feature merged.
I have decided to avoid camelCase and inserted a space or a hyphen
depending on being in doc or code, in order to be consistent with our guidelines.


> > > This patch seems to have been lost/ignored. Could it be merged for 24.11.
> > >
> > > Note: checkpatch complaints here are incorrect. The patch is removing
> > > terms master and slave, but checkpatch can't tell the difference.
> > I thought it would be picked by dpdk-next-net since it looked like a
> > tree-wide change.
> > Since its assigned to me, I will merge it in a day or so and let the
> > set take its course.

I don't know why it was assigned to you.
You could have re-assigned it to me.