From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dpdk.org (dpdk.org [92.243.14.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 516D8A0559; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:37:06 +0100 (CET) Received: from [92.243.14.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8E7A1C0B3; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:37:05 +0100 (CET) Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99D971C0AA for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:37:04 +0100 (CET) Received: from compute7.internal (compute7.nyi.internal [10.202.2.47]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF1E95C03AD; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:37:03 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute7.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:37:03 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=pb7a/R/VC3qfXlB62VFHqu8c5L8bdJPUKPzEWF+DNZI=; b=l3KBGgJk7BVi IFRcn0GfpgjTowcxKeafEpDV9K1WE7Nm9zsXJZIlKturROi0Jm9PF2gvlhaVmyEo dJFRHJGsj71dHMjpTLTo9YNSuM6d9QWq+dMg597DFUUIKEM0m9JIRsq4V8HH9kyO X1lcu5/V+vp37JnXv+ooAsMq4Wa07e4= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; bh=pb7a/R/VC3qfXlB62VFHqu8c5L8bdJPUKPzEWF+DN ZI=; b=V6ZaTGyxUuc/iUS1GY4mYH6Fqq5xpZ8clvKnOd+tzBAR9LVHikGKpsNNc tLlv3EbqwesD7AHP4/2I08JIHDhwU+aAFKxlkdIohQLutm5IKI8ZbxKJhXNR7yEj DlHjEoQoMowIEHhj4EIs8KfN5+MAOQ9vcVUNDBmMB70v423PHsMztK/W+xsFhR0S vwqEVcHlSx61Q+P61dompWS7Geuu793CADPl/qjZNndpkNLUvIh2HI5cFMKPFh8a u72ysfBLe+1SM9Y4NaoPuPThrD5uGZKJagmcfVOj7PnuAVo4NRdKqNIe3V6rE+aT TOObzrkeuEeKKaGypJ08awMveMenQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedugedrudeffedguddufecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmd enucfjughrpefhvffufffkjghfggfgtgesthfuredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepvfhhohhm rghsucfoohhnjhgrlhhonhcuoehthhhomhgrshesmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvghtqeenuc ffohhmrghinhepshhhsgdrtghinecukfhppeejjedrudefgedrvddtfedrudekgeenucev lhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmhgrihhlfhhrohhmpehthhhomhgrsh esmhhonhhjrghlohhnrdhnvght X-ME-Proxy: Received: from xps.localnet (184.203.134.77.rev.sfr.net [77.134.203.184]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C174930614FA; Mon, 16 Mar 2020 14:37:02 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Bruce Richardson Cc: dev@dpdk.org, aconole@redhat.com, ruifeng.wang@arm.com, david.marchand@redhat.com Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:37:01 +0100 Message-ID: <3483262.VQhiAETyHQ@xps> In-Reply-To: <20200316170921.6020-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> References: <20200316170921.6020-1-bruce.richardson@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC PATCH] ci: reduce examples built for static builds X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 16/03/2020 18:09, Bruce Richardson: > Static builds can take a lot of space, so reduce the number of examples > built when doing those static builds. > > Signed-off-by: Bruce Richardson > --- > --- a/.ci/linux-build.sh > +++ b/.ci/linux-build.sh > +if [ "$DEF_LIB" = "static" ] ; then > + OPTS="$OPTS -Dexamples=l2fwd,l3fwd" > +else > + OPTS="$OPTS -Dexamples=all" > +fi I was thinking about doing this kind of change in devtools/test-meson-builds.sh What do you think?