From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mails.dpdk.org (mails.dpdk.org [217.70.189.124]) by inbox.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 257CEA034F; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:59:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [217.70.189.124] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 082F4410F6; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:59:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com (out5-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.29]) by mails.dpdk.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3FCAE406A3; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:59:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9134C5C00A2; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 07:59:41 -0400 (EDT) Received: from mailfrontend2 ([10.202.2.163]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 30 Aug 2021 07:59:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=monjalon.net; h= from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type; s=fm2; bh= lr2uXxESblBvy5+1cSBKXh/8Fzgp9VlmYew9i8gUxts=; b=tDJByjo5TtdF1rWi 72nx6Fos1hovb1261Og4o8WIzYWa42SrxhpU4Ua1UYu8AVt01mmTGpFWTE4CFabd BfsPCC8FWZqVTUCImLg8kNm1RyP7FBVLeh3HcnQ5YCrEA5RjpmUYC8m98xqI9amE 1xV8Vb8Lr1RbRVtNzheJVa5EHtGW4PG7A6REHzb4UYtJaBlGkDHkQ1u06pUd47ej 6ILyca6BC72z3Dxi/7WA7ZstECY+BQPaM3g1WGuWKxbAjL0oKIchkeB76gOUPFIR NTHoss2W3sfHwXqbUPGnEyvSOYtU8+xGtd04TwSTzSRdr/XrBJ5D8Dcps3nbfzzQ v6OVBg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=lr2uXxESblBvy5+1cSBKXh/8Fzgp9VlmYew9i8gUx ts=; b=EZ9pJD5pRbuqQK0Xl8NzcNGujDOrcMytZLBqS00XNfLv7xqGmj1WWlhJ2 fNSCL7zNU9b7hPMmD1EiS2tIiEweqliI8VG6Um0qyvx5BnY54yURAU2KkUE8KqJn GDWMH3xDLig0Mt/aOaJcBMhPd34OY+rODdUyz95rTafuK14qpABYedJVrYJs23/f 4f2sii4xUmLfJwOOwK8IgxtMQ1VKSAw1B/PGElh7oUZC/lQseOG0Stv2zymbUFyP NlbGJEux9k2cDbwprt8hxkbuxkF4XTFH+06AHktp4y1hVLMHryDpusQpAmLR7J6i KE0IU0l7RhHyg+qmKfWOhOv4MU1zQ== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedvtddrudduledggeejucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhephffvufffkfgjfhgggfgtsehtufertddttddvnecuhfhrohhmpefvhhhomhgr shcuofhonhhjrghlohhnuceothhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvtheqnecugg ftrfgrthhtvghrnhepudeggfdvfeduffdtfeeglefghfeukefgfffhueejtdetuedtjeeu ieeivdffgeehnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrh homhepthhhohhmrghssehmohhnjhgrlhhonhdrnhgvth X-ME-Proxy: Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Mon, 30 Aug 2021 07:59:39 -0400 (EDT) From: Thomas Monjalon To: Kamaraj P , dev@dpdk.org, Anatoly Burakov , David Marchand , Ferruh Yigit Cc: ksimha@cisco.com, kalas@cisco.com, seveluch@cisco.com, "techboard@dpdk.org" Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 13:59:36 +0200 Message-ID: <3485790.tFL5Z3R0ll@thomas> In-Reply-To: <66ba0b52-83bf-f7a0-aa79-66a267af32c4@intel.com> References: <66ba0b52-83bf-f7a0-aa79-66a267af32c4@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [dpdk-dev] Running DPDK application with non-previlege mode X-BeenThere: dev@dpdk.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: DPDK patches and discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: dev-bounces@dpdk.org Sender: "dev" 30/08/2021 13:26, Ferruh Yigit: > On 8/30/2021 8:52 AM, Kamaraj P wrote: > > Hello All, > > Some more info. > > We are using DPDK 19.11. > > > > When we bringup application with --security-opt seccomp=unconfined > > option.. > > THe application bringup successfully and didnt observe any error when DPDK > > init logs. > > Will that --security-opt seccomp=unconfined option recommended for > > non-previlege mode for DPDK application ? > > Please suggest. > > > > + Anatoly, he may have experience on running on non-privilege mode. > > > Thomas, David, > > What do you think documenting how to run as non root, we had similar question > before, if memory serves me right Red Hat was looking for same thing at some point. I started working on such documentation, focusing on mlx5 use case. I need more time to complete it. > If we are agree, perhaps we can find a volunteer in the tech board for it. I would be volunteer, and welcome any help.