[dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

[dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

[Verma, Shally]

Hi Fiona

We are planning to implement ZLIB based SW PMD to proof-concept DPDK compression RFC v3 API spec internally. However, would like to check
If you're working upon similar in parallel and if yes, then what's your development roadmap / strategy so that we could see if we could leverage joint effort.
Depending upon your feedback, we can see if we can have some common repo for joint development or send it as RFC patch.

Let me know your opinion on same.

Thanks
Shally

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

[Trahe, Fiona]

Hi Shally,


From: Verma, Shally [mailto:Shally.Verma@cavium.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:33 AM
To: Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Gupta, Ashish <Ashish.Gupta@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila <Sunila.Sahu@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal <Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad <NarayanaPrasad.Athreya@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Youri Querry <youri.querry_1@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour <ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>
Subject: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

Hi Fiona

We are planning to implement ZLIB based SW PMD to proof-concept DPDK compression RFC v3 API spec internally. However, would like to check
If you're working upon similar in parallel and if yes, then what's your development roadmap / strategy so that we could see if we could leverage joint effort.
Depending upon your feedback, we can see if we can have some common repo for joint development or send it as RFC patch.

Let me know your opinion on same.
[Fiona] We have not started a zlib based SW PMD, and would be delighted if you would do this, I agree it's a
good way to prove out the API.
We are writing some unit tests against the API, we would be happy to share these with you, and continue to develop these
jointly so the same test sets can be targeted against all PMDs.
I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the maintainers about getting one set up.

Thanks
Shally

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

[Verma, Shally]

Hi Fiona

> I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the maintainers about getting one set up.
Sure. Please share us details when it is available. I assume it will be created once API spec move from RFC to 1st version?

Thanks
Shally

From: Trahe, Fiona [mailto:fiona.trahe@intel.com] 
Sent: 12 January 2018 00:31
To: Verma, Shally <Shally.Verma@cavium.com>; dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Gupta, Ashish <Ashish.Gupta@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila <Sunila.Sahu@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal <Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad <NarayanaPrasad.Athreya@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Youri Querry <youri.querry_1@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour <ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>; Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

Hi Shally,


From: Verma, Shally [mailto:Shally.Verma@cavium.com] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:33 AM
To: Trahe, Fiona <mailto:fiona.trahe@intel.com>; mailto:dev@dpdk.org
Cc: Gupta, Ashish <mailto:Ashish.Gupta@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila <mailto:Sunila.Sahu@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal <mailto:Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad <mailto:NarayanaPrasad.Athreya@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <mailto:pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <mailto:deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Roy Pledge <mailto:roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Youri Querry <mailto:youri.querry_1@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <mailto:hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour <mailto:ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>
Subject: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

Hi Fiona 

We are planning to implement ZLIB based SW PMD to proof-concept DPDK compression RFC v3 API spec internally. However, would like to check
If you're working upon similar in parallel and if yes, then what's your development roadmap / strategy so that we could see if we could leverage joint effort. 
Depending upon your feedback, we can see if we can have some common repo for joint development or send it as RFC patch.

Let me know your opinion on same.
[Fiona] We have not started a zlib based SW PMD, and would be delighted if you would do this, I agree it's a 
good way to prove out the API.
We are writing some unit tests against the API, we would be happy to share these with you, and continue to develop these
jointly so the same test sets can be targeted against all PMDs. 
I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the maintainers about getting one set up.

Thanks
Shally

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

[Verma, Shally]

HI Fiona 

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Verma, Shally
>Sent: 12 January 2018 19:24
>To: 'Trahe, Fiona' <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Gupta, Ashish <Ashish.Gupta@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila <Sunila.Sahu@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal
><Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad <NarayanaPrasad.Athreya@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
><pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Youri Querry
><youri.querry_1@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour <ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>; De Lara
>Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
>Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
>
>Hi Fiona
>
>> I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the maintainers about getting one set up.
>Sure. Please share us details when it is available. I assume it will be created once API spec move from RFC to 1st version?
>
[Shally] Any update on this? We're available with sample SW ZLIB based implementation (currently proof-concepted for stateless only) . So, if any repo is available, we can upload it there.

>Thanks
>Shally
>
>From: Trahe, Fiona [mailto:fiona.trahe@intel.com]
>Sent: 12 January 2018 00:31
>To: Verma, Shally <Shally.Verma@cavium.com>; dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Gupta, Ashish <Ashish.Gupta@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila <Sunila.Sahu@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal
><Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad <NarayanaPrasad.Athreya@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
><pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Youri Querry
><youri.querry_1@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour <ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>; Trahe,
>Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
>Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
>
>Hi Shally,
>
>
>From: Verma, Shally [mailto:Shally.Verma@cavium.com]
>Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:33 AM
>To: Trahe, Fiona <mailto:fiona.trahe@intel.com>; mailto:dev@dpdk.org
>Cc: Gupta, Ashish <mailto:Ashish.Gupta@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila <mailto:Sunila.Sahu@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal
><mailto:Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad <mailto:NarayanaPrasad.Athreya@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch,
>Pablo <mailto:pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K <mailto:deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Roy Pledge
><mailto:roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Youri Querry <mailto:youri.querry_1@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal
><mailto:hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour <mailto:ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>
>Subject: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
>
>Hi Fiona
>
>We are planning to implement ZLIB based SW PMD to proof-concept DPDK compression RFC v3 API spec internally. However, would
>like to check
>If you're working upon similar in parallel and if yes, then what's your development roadmap / strategy so that we could see if we
>could leverage joint effort.
>Depending upon your feedback, we can see if we can have some common repo for joint development or send it as RFC patch.
>
>Let me know your opinion on same.
>[Fiona] We have not started a zlib based SW PMD, and would be delighted if you would do this, I agree it's a
>good way to prove out the API.
>We are writing some unit tests against the API, we would be happy to share these with you, and continue to develop these
>jointly so the same test sets can be targeted against all PMDs.
>I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to the maintainers about getting one set up.
>
>Thanks
>Shally

Re: [dpdk-dev] [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD

[Jain, Deepak K]

Hi Shally,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Verma, Shally [mailto:Shally.Verma@cavium.com]
> Sent: Friday, February 2, 2018 11:27 AM
> To: Trahe, Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> Cc: Gupta, Ashish <Ashish.Gupta@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila
> <Sunila.Sahu@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal <Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com>;
> Athreya, Narayana Prasad <NarayanaPrasad.Athreya@cavium.com>; De Lara
> Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K
> <deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Youri
> Querry <youri.querry_1@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> <hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour
> <ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
 ><deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Youri
> >Querry <youri.querry_1@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> ><hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour
> <ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>; De
> >Lara Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> >Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
> >
> >Hi Fiona
> >
> >> I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to
> the maintainers about getting one set up.
> >Sure. Please share us details when it is available. I assume it will be created
> once API spec move from RFC to 1st version?
> >
> [Shally] Any update on this? We're available with sample SW ZLIB based
> implementation (currently proof-concepted for stateless only) . So, if any
> repo is available, we can upload it there.

We are working towards getting final internal approvals and will have more info. on this early next week.

> 
> >Thanks
> >Shally
> >
> >From: Trahe, Fiona [mailto:fiona.trahe@intel.com]
> >Sent: 12 January 2018 00:31
> >To: Verma, Shally <Shally.Verma@cavium.com>; dev@dpdk.org
> >Cc: Gupta, Ashish <Ashish.Gupta@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila
> ><Sunila.Sahu@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal
> <Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com>;
> >Athreya, Narayana Prasad <NarayanaPrasad.Athreya@cavium.com>; De
> Lara
> >Guarch, Pablo <pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K
> ><deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Roy Pledge <roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Youri
> >Querry <youri.querry_1@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> ><hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour
> <ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>; Trahe,
> >Fiona <fiona.trahe@intel.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> ><pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>
> >Subject: RE: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
> >
> >Hi Shally,
> >
> >
> >From: Verma, Shally [mailto:Shally.Verma@cavium.com]
> >Sent: Wednesday, January 10, 2018 8:33 AM
> >To: Trahe, Fiona <mailto:fiona.trahe@intel.com>; mailto:dev@dpdk.org
> >Cc: Gupta, Ashish <mailto:Ashish.Gupta@cavium.com>; Sahu, Sunila
> ><mailto:Sunila.Sahu@cavium.com>; Challa, Mahipal
> ><mailto:Mahipal.Challa@cavium.com>; Athreya, Narayana Prasad
> ><mailto:NarayanaPrasad.Athreya@cavium.com>; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> ><mailto:pablo.de.lara.guarch@intel.com>; Jain, Deepak K
> ><mailto:deepak.k.jain@intel.com>; Roy Pledge
> ><mailto:roy.pledge@nxp.com>; Youri Querry
> ><mailto:youri.querry_1@nxp.com>; Hemant Agrawal
> ><mailto:hemant.agrawal@nxp.com>; Ahmed Mansour
> ><mailto:ahmed.mansour@nxp.com>
> >Subject: [RFC v3] Compression API in DPDK :SW ZLIB PMD
> >
> >Hi Fiona
> >
> >We are planning to implement ZLIB based SW PMD to proof-concept DPDK
> >compression RFC v3 API spec internally. However, would like to check If
> >you're working upon similar in parallel and if yes, then what's your
> >development roadmap / strategy so that we could see if we could leverage
> joint effort.
> >Depending upon your feedback, we can see if we can have some common
> repo for joint development or send it as RFC patch.
> >
> >Let me know your opinion on same.
> >[Fiona] We have not started a zlib based SW PMD, and would be delighted
> >if you would do this, I agree it's a good way to prove out the API.
> >We are writing some unit tests against the API, we would be happy to
> >share these with you, and continue to develop these jointly so the same
> test sets can be targeted against all PMDs.
> >I think a common draft repo would be the best way forward. Let's talk to
> the maintainers about getting one set up.
> >
> >Thanks
> >Shally